Charge on a property.

Soldato
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
A friend of mine has troubles with a company such that he has been fined around 40k.

this is money he doesn't have (I don't either ftw) and his legal team have said that he will be put through an affordability calculator to workout how he can pay this money back per month. This Could take a long time though to payback.

His problem is that there is a slight chance said company will put a charge on his home. He lives there with his family but only his name is on the home. He claims this means he will be forced to sell the property. I did not think this was the case?

He's basically looking for someone to help him out i.e transfer of equity so said company can't touch his home. Though I dread the idea of helping him out here as I don't trust what he's telling me to begin with and even if I did help I would take independent legal advice.

Can the said company force him to sell his home to payback his fines? Or could it be that he could live there and when he sells he will be forced to pay said company back that money he owes.

Imho mixing business with friends/family is not often a good idea. what would you all do?
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Posts
12,096
Nothing without complete transparency.
Nothing without legal advice at his cost.
Then probably nothing as it’ll most likely come back to bite you.

I would have thought that deliberately moving assets to avoid paying your debts would be heavily frowned on by the courts.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jul 2011
Posts
2,343
A charge on a property means they have a claim to any money from the sale of said property.

A legal charge is a method by which a lender protects the money they have lent to an individual or company. It is a legal document signed by the borrower and which is registered against a property at the Land Registry so as to alert any potential buyer of the existence of the debt.

I would stay the hell away from lending money or getting involved legally with this. He's obviously worried about the company going after his assets, although why he is he looking for you to take them on, rather than family is a big red flag to me.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
thanks for confirming regarding the charge. Is there something different that HMRC can do? Said company = HMRC

I wonder if that would change things here. personally I don't see how though.

I am going to run a mile for sure but he's got himself into such a bad position and doing absolutely everything to make his life easier rather than live up and face the consequences that he's got into. I don't see a feasible way out of this.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Posts
12,345
As others have said, they can't force a sale of the home - i believe only your mortgage lender can do this via repossession.

But will mean if he ever sells, or his children have to sell the house when he dies, then the company get paid their monies.

I'm more curious how he managed to incur a 40k fine? Is it actually a fine, or has this company taken him to court for something, and the court has ordered your friend to pay 40k in damages?
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
As others have said, they can't force a sale of the home - i believe only your mortgage lender can do this via repossession.

But will mean if he ever sells, or his children have to sell the house when he dies, then the company get paid their monies.

I'm more curious how he managed to incur a 40k fine? Is it actually a fine, or has this company taken him to court for something, and the court has ordered your friend to pay 40k in damages?


He's been a bit silly broken the law basically. I can't say much more about this.
He could have gone to jail but luckily he's had a good track record in the past.

I told him that if you play with fire you get burned. He's suffering now but sadly so are his family. No sympathy for him right now.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jul 2011
Posts
2,343
You know HMRC isnt a company... ? Thats Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs.
With greater powers than the Police to make your life a misery.

I understand you friend wanting to protect his home, but trying to involve you in avoiding liabilities to HMRC is asking for trouble for both of you.
Be his friend by all means. Don't be his fall guy.
 
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,426
Location
Wilds of suffolk
£40k to HMRC is quite a lot for the average person

Is he self employed or running a small business?

Has the debt been fixed in value, or are HMRC allowed to keep adding interest?

If he owes HMRC a lot and hes got away with a charge hes done ok to be honest, they normally don't like recovery of underpaid tax/fines to be dragged out too far.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
You know HMRC isnt a company... ? Thats Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs.
With greater powers than the Police to make your life a misery.

I understand you friend wanting to protect his home, but trying to involve you in avoiding liabilities to HMRC is asking for trouble for both of you.
Be his friend by all means. Don't be his fall guy.

yes I know they are the highest of the highest that's why I'm wondering whether there is power to force him to sell to cough up the amount.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
£40k to HMRC is quite a lot for the average person

Is he self employed or running a small business?

Has the debt been fixed in value, or are HMRC allowed to keep adding interest?

If he owes HMRC a lot and hes got away with a charge hes done ok to be honest, they normally don't like recovery of underpaid tax/fines to be dragged out too far.

Self employed I believe. - does it make a difference?

I believe he said fixed at 40k he didn't mention anything about interest to me.

his legal advisor said that there is a chance this might never happen but if he did he needs to be prepared for a charge on his property. like you said also they tend not to want it to drag on too long.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
I do find it funny that you say he was a bit silly ,just has managed to get a £40k fine :p. Surely the best person to ask would be his lawyer?

Yep it really does not stop there, like there are other debts on his head ie like credit cards who knows how much and how many?

debt is a difficult thing to talk about to anyone.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jul 2011
Posts
2,343
Yep it really does not stop there, like there are other debts on his head ie like credit cards who knows how much and how many?

debt is a difficult thing to talk about to anyone.

Credit card debt is at least unsecured. The card providers can chase him for money, but they're more limited unlike HMRC who have some power of seizure without needing to go thru a county court etc.

Debt or financial difficulty is exceedingly difficult to talk about for a lot of people, and is a big factor in mental health.

Is he getting good independent debt advice from someone, or is this all being dealt with by his legal people [whoever they are]?
 
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,426
Location
Wilds of suffolk
Self employed I believe. - does it make a difference?

I believe he said fixed at 40k he didn't mention anything about interest to me.

his legal advisor said that there is a chance this might never happen but if he did he needs to be prepared for a charge on his property. like you said also they tend not to want it to drag on too long.

Doesnt make a specific difference, but wondered why they may not try to do a deduction in income at source, that explains why
Also most individuals (bar the super wealthy) who tend to have run ins with HMRC tend to be self employed or running a small business, why?
Because they have most opportunity to con the system.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
Credit card debt is at least unsecured. The card providers can chase him for money, but they're more limited unlike HMRC who have some power of seizure without needing to go thru a county court etc.

Debt or financial difficulty is exceedingly difficult to talk about for a lot of people, and is a big factor in mental health.

Is he getting good independent debt advice from someone, or is this all being dealt with by his legal people [whoever they are]?

I'm not sure if he is getting debt advice but he is getting legal advice.

thanks.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
but wondered why they may not try to do a deduction in income at source, that explains why
Also most individuals (bar the super wealthy) who tend to have run ins with HMRC tend to be self employed or running a small business, why?
Because they have most opportunity to con the system.

what do you mean by deduction at source?

yep I agree, people can exploit this area much easier. For example all of those shops I go to that NEVER accept credit/debit cards and cash only. I get the feeling that cash is being buried for safe keeping in gaping hole somewhere :)
 
Back
Top Bottom