Joker (2019)

Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
I’m not sure how the ending is up for debate??

He killed the lady that was his psychiatrist or whatever? It sure how that is in dispute.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2005
Posts
12,451
Saw it last night it was okay, certainly didn't feel like it was a DC adaptation, some parts were good some were pretty generic, just an average film, don't see the fuss apart from Phoenix's performance which was great
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,892
Watched it yesterday, decent film and great performance by phenix.

On the ending.

are they trying to say that basically the Joker created batman?
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Posts
31,991
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
I've enjoyed reading all the different theories and interpretations in this thread. Obviously it's too much to expect uniform agreement on a film that's highly subjective, with multiple dream sequences and plot forks.

To me, the ultimate significance of Joker is twofold:

* it's the first movie to rehabilitate the Joker as a sympathetic anti-hero with an official backstory
* it's the first movie to establish Batman as a canonical character within DC's Dark Extended Jokerverse
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Posts
31,991
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
You know what's particularly amazing about this movie? It's a wildly successful comic book supervillain film without a single explosion or gun fight. Michael Bay could learn a thing or two from Joker.

I don't think the film was trying to make him sympathetic, at all.

His story was tragic, but I don't sympathise with him.

Seriously? I was sympathising all the way.
 
Associate
Joined
11 Apr 2003
Posts
1,520
I enjoyed the movie immensely , but did feel it fell a bit short in creating the complex motivations when compared to Taxi Driver or King of Comedy, both of which the Joker does seem to pay homage to.

Will definitely need to watch it again, as on first watch I try not to not think too much about themes and comparisons, but just stay in the moment.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
15 Jan 2006
Posts
32,390
Location
Tosche Station
For me, and many others... sort of? There are ********* in the world that take so much and are basically untouchable. I sort of saw it all as a ‘revenge’ against the system.

Totally this. The idea is that people were getting what they deserved, to miss that is to miss the point of the movie. Whether or not they truly deserved it when "zoomed out" is a different matter, when you're down the rabbit hole of the movie the way the scenes come together is very much soaked in "satisfying and justified revenge". If I didn't feel that in those moments, the movie wouldn't have been anywhere near as enjoyable.
 
Soldato
Joined
11 Jun 2015
Posts
11,181
Location
Bristol
They only 'deserve' it if you're watching the film for Arthur's point of view.
I think it shows everyone is only a day away from going crazy. It's a downward spiral with an inevitable conclusion that if someone is pushed too much some may snap and go werewolf as he says. So you can sympathise why someone would feel that way, but not with how he acted it out
 
Man of Honour
Joined
15 Jan 2006
Posts
32,390
Location
Tosche Station
Im not sure Robert De Niro deserved to be murdered just for making fun of him with the footage.

I hate to go all The Sun on you and put the bit that's important in bold but...

Whether or not they truly deserved it when "zoomed out" is a different matter, when you're down the rabbit hole of the movie the way the scenes come together is very much soaked in "satisfying and justified revenge".
 
Back
Top Bottom