There is very very little shown of the actual cruelty thankfully, only the lead up, which in itself is obviously disturbing enough.
It felt nothing like that for me. Not sure how it could be said that she was 'too excited', given the gravity of what she was investigating!
Mildly annoying, yeah, but not for that reason.
I guess it was all the cringworthy comments on the Facebook group. They felt they were super slueths but what they actually found out was Jack ****. The only reason they had even an ounce of a chance of working out who it was, was because he sent them a message saying you need to take a look at this person.
The end of the doc was pathetic in what she said about implications.
It just seemed like she felt like she helped, when in fact they are probably the reason that guy died because they should have done more to inform authorities before, rather than after he did what he did.
People will disagree because they believe the police wouldn't investigate cats, and that they didn't have any solid evidence to hand them, which is exactly my point.
They were nothing but bystanders who felt they were soooo great, with no evidence other than what the killer gave them every step of the way.
I look at it 2 ways and I can't say which it is..
1- He started it because he's mental and was gonna do it anyway.
2- He started it to **** people off and it escalated because they created that group and he fed off their investigation.
She'll have to live with never knowing if it's #2