Associate
But enough to support someone conveniently present, maybe a PCSO or passing beat bobby, who smells it and comes to investigate?
Tests cost as little as £50, apparently.
What would the costs be of a parent suing the care company when a junkie employee's negligence results in harm to or death of a child in their care?
Besides, I presume the company drugs policy will state something about being found to have drugs in one's system, regardless of when it was taken. Ours does - You might not have taken drugs for a week or more, but if they're still in you then you're out.
The booby point is indeed one way the manager or the Ops partner to prove that the drug taking was happening at work. For all employers that would be a compelling reason for dismissal. Practically that might be more tricky as I'm not how interested the police are in personal use and unless he's so incapable the kids are physical danger, his suitability to oversee kids is probably a question is probably one for his employer
Our policy is that is unacceptable for employees to under the influence at work but does not , I believe allow for testing without the employees consent (though the policy also allows that non consent could be seen as essentially an admission of guilt) and it can certainly only be administered by an appropriate Occupational Health clinician. My boss certainly could not rock up at my desk with a cup and a kit he'd bought from eBay for £50 and demand I comply with a drug test....
However having read our policy. I'd expect my manager to respond in the following way:
1: Having received complaint, invites employee to meeting
2: Explains nature of complaint without disclosing identifying features and directs asks employee if they have a substance abuse problem. If they admit to one, sign post to support. Remind employee of the need to be free from the influence of all intoxicants at work and failure to comply with this would result in disciplinary action and ultimately could lead to termination.
3: refer employee to Occupational Health for support (employee and employer)
4: continue to monitor employee for signs of intoxication at work and if other signs are found meet with employee again and consider disciplinary action.
This supposed, like the OP, that while the employees intoxication at work made lapses in care and safety unacceptably high, no act of gross misconduct occurred.
I've kind of change my mind OP I think your partners boss has chickened out of dealing with an awkward situation. She should have had more gumption.
She doesn't need to be able to prove anything just begin investigating I think that's what I had failed to grasp.