Article 13: UK will not implement EU copyright law

Soldato
Joined
26 May 2007
Posts
6,284
Good news.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-51240785

Universities and Science Minister Chris Skidmore has said that the UK will not implement the EU Copyright Directive after the country leaves the EU.

Several companies have criticised the law, which would hold them accountable for not removing copyrighted content uploaded by users, if it is passed.

EU member states have until 7 June 2021 to implement the new reforms, but the UK will have left the EU by then.

The UK was among 19 nations that initially supported the law.

That was in its final European Council vote in April 2019.

'Terrible for the internet'
Copyright is the legal right that allows an artist to protect how their original work is used.

The EU Copyright Directive that covers how "online content-sharing services" should deal with copyright-protected content, such as television programmes and movies.

It refers to services that primarily exist to give the public access to "protected works or other protected subject-matter uploaded by its users", such as Soundcloud, Dailymotion and YouTube.

It was Article 13 which prompted fears over the future of memes and GIFs - stills, animated or short video clips that go viral - since they mainly rely on copyrighted scenes from TV and film.

Critics claimed Article 13 would make it nearly impossible to upload even the tiniest part of a copyrighted work to Facebook, YouTube, or any other site.

However, specific tweaks to the law in 2019 made memes safe "for purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody and pastiche".

Prime Minister Boris Johnson criticised the law in March, claiming that it was "terrible for the internet".

Google had campaigned fiercely against the changes, arguing they would "harm Europe's creative and digital industries" and "change the web as we know it".
 
Soldato
Joined
11 Mar 2004
Posts
5,000
"However, specific tweaks to the law in 2019 made memes safe "for purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody and pastiche".

Meme's are safe. This would require the social media companies to police the content on their own platforms. I can see why its in their interest to argue they are not responsible for the content their own users upload to their service. I'm not sure its in the interests of everyone else. The copyright laws are extremely out of date and have not kept pace with current technology.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Feb 2007
Posts
14,107
Location
Leafy Cheshire
Yeah good news now but presumably something else is on the way in its place.

Brought to you by the country that's just authorised facial recognition cameras all over London and it's attempted face sitting firewall.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
"However, specific tweaks to the law in 2019 made memes safe "for purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody and pastiche".

Meme's are safe. This would require the social media companies to police the content on their own platforms. I can see why its in their interest to argue they are not responsible for the content their own users upload to their service. I'm not sure its in the interests of everyone else. The copyright laws are extremely out of date and have not kept pace with current technology.
Ultimately, whose responsibility is it to police the things that we, as individuals, do on the internet? In your opinion?

The ISPs? The hosting companies? Should every service police user generated content on that service? How? And why?
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Mar 2004
Posts
29,913
Location
England
Excellent news, praise be to brexit. Article 13 was such a poor, vague piece of legislation that would have put an overly onerous responsibility on platforms to prevent copyrighted misuse.

This is the sort of legislation you get when you have an unelected council creating legislation.
 
Back
Top Bottom