Poll: *** Xbox Series X|S - General Discussion Thread ***

Which will you buy?

  • Series X

    Votes: 530 59.8%
  • Series S

    Votes: 104 11.7%
  • Not interested

    Votes: 230 26.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 22 2.5%

  • Total voters
    886
Soldato
Joined
17 Apr 2009
Posts
7,588
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2003
Posts
19,413
Location
Midlands
I doubt they do but they would have kept a record on what dev kits went where then it wouldn't be hard to track who had access to that unit.
Oh absolutely, if it's not an "authorised" leak then the person that's had their prototype snapped could be in trouble, but I doubt very much. Ultimately, we've already seen it, this isn't giving us a whole lot more than some connections.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Jul 2004
Posts
44,080
Location
/* */
Hmmm. Interesting theory. But why put a slot for interchangeable cards in the back? Surely that would be better suited to the front of the console?

It's just a PCIe interface. It will be for adding storage via an external enclosure as the nvme ssd will be soldered to the board.

USB drives won't be fast enough to expand the storage if that internal drive is the minimum standards games are coded for.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Jul 2004
Posts
44,080
Location
/* */
Thunderbolt 3 with a USB-C connector would surely be the more consumer friendly solution? Not as tidy I suppose but still fast enough.

AMD (the manufacturer of the CPU and GPU in the One Series X) don't support Thunderbolt, probably because it's an Intel controlled standard and those two don't play well together.
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Apr 2009
Posts
7,588
I'm sceptical of the CFexpress rumour.

With current game install sizes, there's unlikely to be any demand for cards smaller than 500GB. A 512GB Cfexpress card costs just shy of £700 on the rainforest. A 500GB NVME costs ~£50. So unless CFexpress prices are expected to fall by around 90% over the next 12 months, I can't see why they wouldn't use NVME in a custom enclosure instead.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2004
Posts
9,674
Location
Somerset
I'm sceptical of the CFexpress rumour.

With current game install sizes, there's unlikely to be any demand for cards smaller than 500GB. A 512GB Cfexpress card costs just shy of £700 on the rainforest. A 500GB NVME costs ~£50. So unless CFexpress prices are expected to fall by around 90% over the next 12 months, I can't see why they wouldn't use NVME in a custom enclosure instead.

As far as I can tell, that’s exactly what CFExpress is - NVMe in a custom enclosure. There’s just no demand for it yet.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Jul 2004
Posts
44,080
Location
/* */
i thought tb3 is royalty free now? Unless you meant from a technical perspective
Historically AMD have been against adding it for those reasons, and I believe that Intel still control the standard even though it's royalty free now due to poor uptake.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2004
Posts
9,674
Location
Somerset
Historically AMD have been against adding it for those reasons, and I believe that Intel still control the standard even though it's royalty free now due to poor uptake.

It might be telling what happens this year with Apple, pretty sure their laptops will move to AMD but they've always been a great proponent of Thunderbolt.
 
Back
Top Bottom