When are you going fully electric?

Associate
Joined
16 Jan 2003
Posts
1,913
Hasn’t the amount of electricity usage in general gone down though over the past decade due to better efficiency/LEDS/solar etc. Obviously EV’s may well change this but I really don’t see it as that big of an issue. Companies like octopus energy for instance allow a cheaper rate of power over a 4 hour period overnight. They also offer I think via email a trial where people can use a different 4 hour slot for slightly different prices. This will change behaviour and allow the grid to be better balanced and hence stop or reduce everyone charging at peak time’s (18:00 when home). the energy produced at these not peak times is also greener as I think
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2005
Posts
17,285
Location
Bristol
Hasn’t the amount of electricity usage in general gone down though over the past decade due to better efficiency/LEDS/solar etc. Obviously EV’s may well change this but I really don’t see it as that big of an issue. Companies like octopus energy for instance allow a cheaper rate of power over a 4 hour period overnight. They also offer I think via email a trial where people can use a different 4 hour slot for slightly different prices. This will change behaviour and allow the grid to be better balanced and hence stop or reduce everyone charging at peak time’s (18:00 when home). the energy produced at these not peak times is also greener as I think

The Octopus Go tariff is 100% renewable energy at all times. That raises another infrastructure potential problem though in energy storage; whilst power stations can run consistently 24/7 you can't rely on solar, wind or tidal etc to be able to cope with demand at 3am.

Of course that's another area of business for Tesla.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Nov 2004
Posts
15,688
Location
East of England
I don't think 2035 is that ambitions to be honest. There are tons of new EVs coming over the next 24 months and all of the major manufacturers have committed to EV production (except Mazda I believe). We're talking 15 years.
The only question is whether battery production can keep pace with demand.

I agree entirely. I really think we forget how far we have come in terms of tech and it's amazing when you look back. In 2004/2005, 15 years ago, this was one of the most advanced pieces of consumer tech out there.

s-l640.jpg


I don't think it even had Bluetooth. In fact, Bluetooth wasn't even a thing that anyone really knew about. Same as WiFi. If you could get a signal to send a 160 character text message, without standing next to the upstairs window for 5 minutes, you were in luck. People still answered their home landline phone and said the phone number before they spoke. Half the people in the country still had to listen to their computer making musical noises before they could go on AOL chat. And then would tie up the phone line for hours at a time so no one could get through. The idea of an iPhone with a touchscreen was still several years away. Google Maps hadn't been invented yet, Google Street View was not even an idea then.

Having Sat Nav in cars was reserved for top end cars only and most of the screens were about 100 pixels x 200 pixels. The E39 BMW M5 was still (almost) the current pinnacle of super saloons and tech in a car. Many cars still had phones in the centre console. Self driving cars was literally something from sci-fi movies still. Cars running off electricity was something a very, very small number of manufacturers were even playing with and making the odd one as a prototype.

This is just 15 years ago.

As with all tech, things accelerate geometrically. So 15 years to get EV cars where it's the only thing you can buy from a dealer is pretty unambitious considering that many of the EV's out at the moment are not too bad at all. In the 5 years I'd expect there to have an explosion in the amount of EV's on the road and for them to be much better. In 10 years, i'd expect EV's to be head and shoulders better than they are now, with them even more efficient with the same size batteries, and bigger battery packs. If the Government aren't morons, they should be predicting this and should start building EV infrastructure like...right now. The first way they do this is by getting low cost offshore wind farms up, building a few nuclear power plants and getting rid of gas/coal power. That's half the battle won. The next half is getting it to people's homes, but in the next 5 years, i don't think that is going to be a problem.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
14,114
Location
West Midlands
Let's not forget how pivotal V2G is going to become, as the number of BEV's increase. I fully expect a standard to be reached before the 2023, and power credits to be introduced for using it.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2005
Posts
17,285
Location
Bristol
It is pretty crazy to look back. Even with regards to cars 15 years ago I had my first which was an f-reg Mini Mayfair (1988) that had a choke and you had to supplement the fuel with lead. Granted it was older than most people's cars but it certainly wasn't unusual or crazy, and a few people at my college had similar cars.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
14,114
Location
West Midlands
Drop back 30 years, to 1990 and the internet wasn't a thing for most folks, heck most people had a Commodore 64 as a home computer or a Spectrum, mobile phones barely existed and the analog coverage was limited to a tiny fraction of the country. CRT TV's averaged less than 24", and the only digital flat screen you had was on your top of the range Casio calculator watch. :D
 
Don
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
22,737
Location
Wargrave, UK
I'm thinking back to the mid 90s when the vast majority of cars were petrol. There was usually the one token diesel model in the range or they were absent altogether. In the UK the BMW E32 and E38 7-series were never offered with a diesel engine for example.
How long did it take for diesel to overtake petrol massively?
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2005
Posts
17,285
Location
Bristol
I'm thinking back to the mid 90s when the vast majority of cars were petrol. There was usually the one token diesel model in the range or they were absent altogether. In the UK the BMW E32 and E38 7-series were never offered with a diesel engine for example.
How long did it take for diesel to overtake petrol massively?

July 2010 apparently: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/aug/05/diesel-car-sales-overtake-petrol

That article led me here: https://www.smmt.co.uk/vehicle-data/
 
Last edited:
Don
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
22,737
Location
Wargrave, UK
Interesting. The big tax breaks for diesel started around 2000 wasn't it? So, 10 years roughly.
Admittedly, it's quite a bit different considering that diesel adoption didn't require new fueling stations but it's a reasonable example of how policy changes can affect buying habits in the motor industry. The new 0% BIK rate for long range EVs I think will make a massive difference to EV adoption.
 
Associate
Joined
9 Feb 2009
Posts
1,419
Location
Up North
Just about to take my first plunge with a PHEV - ordered a Kia Niro PHEV 3 as a company vehicle due to the low BIK. The electric only range should also cover most of the commuting and general nipping around town driving (I will charge it nightly so always full in morning).
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2005
Posts
17,285
Location
Bristol
Just about to take my first plunge with a PHEV - ordered a Kia Niro PHEV 3 as a company vehicle due to the low BIK. The electric only range should also cover most of the commuting and general nipping around town driving (I will charge it nightly so always full in morning).

Just out of interest - not a criticism - what were the reasons you opted for a PHEV rather than a fully electric?
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
10,632
Location
Notts
It is remarkable how fast technology can evolve when there’s a concerted effort. Extreme example, but the Apollo Program kicked off in 1961. Eight years later, we were on the moon.

Fifteen years before it began, the official world air speed record was still below the sound barrier!
 

SPG

SPG

Soldato
Joined
28 Jul 2010
Posts
10,255
I work a lot with EV especially large and small California types, The battery tech is 15-20 years away from giving people what they want (they also demand putting every bell and whistle inside a vehicle which requires power which in turn reduces range....go figure) It will also have trippled in price due to the rare earth elements becoming rarer still.

Just think every UK service stations car park would require a charge point or at the minimum 50% of it,

Hydrogen is the only viable solution, its plentiful easy to store and just requires a a couple of nuclear power-plants dedicated to its production :)
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
8,868
Location
Winchester
The optimist sees opportunity in every danger. Plenty of opportunity and money to be made in these coming decades, for those that step up.

I don't dispute that! If you have a garage, train up mechanics to learn maintaining electric vehicles. Students should look into sudying subjects relevant to renewables and nuclear energy. Compasnies in construction should look to diversify and expand their portfolia towards electric infrastructure. etc...

People wand businesses will try to do that, but will only be successful as long as government support them, implement the right policies and invest in the infrastructure.

Back on topic, I don't know if I want to next car to be a big petrol one for a last hurrah, or to get a hybrid (I like the Corolla, not that I've tried others).
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Jul 2009
Posts
5,014
Location
Manchester
Look the King has no clothes on...
Theres no way electric vehicles will ever be viable, for starters they are far from emission free, they only move the pollutants elsewhere.
The best industrial power tool batteries last around 3 years, 5 at max.
They loose capacity from the first use.
I would basically forget this white elephant and wait for the future alternative, whatever that will be.
Sure current users of EV are enjoying them, but that’s only because so few people are using them.
The load on the national grid will be crippling alone if all internal combustion engines where replaced.
It just doesn’t make any logical sense.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 Aug 2012
Posts
7,809
I cant see existing petrol stations becoming EV charging points, the dynamics are too different. Thats assuming there isnt a big breakthrough in charging speed.

Back of envelope numbers.

There may be some wriggle room, but the orders of magnitude cant be too far out....

Consider the typical filling station, let alone a motorway one.

Combine the typical range that the average (IE not the super expensive high-performance ones) consumer EV is likely to be capable of and the speed at which it can be recharged.

"Little" station just down the road has 8 filling "Slots"

To have a similar utility in terms of charging capacity, it will need 2/4 times as many slots due to range limitations and another 2/4 times as many slots because of charging time.

(Oh and before anybody mentions home charging, While this reduces the charge point problem to some extent, it doesn’t really solve the overall electrical capacity one of course. It just sends it somewhere else)

IE up to 16 times as many slots.

To achieve the same effective refuelling capacity (Time taken x frequency of refuelling) my local filling station will need nearer 100 charge points (Perhaps even more).

Let us ignore the fact that it simply doesn’t have room for this.

Now, assume they each have up to 100 Kw charging capacity.

That means that for even a "Small" recharge station to have the same overall capacity as a petrol/diesel one, it will need an electrical supply capacity in excess of 10MW

That will need its own personal substation, with its own personal 33Kv supply. (Maybe even higher if it is a long way from the local "Big" substation!)

Apply the same numbers to a motorway services, which currently most people will try to avoid like the plague because of high costs, Now factor in even more extra capacity because people will need to make multiple recharges during long journeys, rather than fill up before setting off and filling up at the destination, because with EV's they will have to because of range limitations,

To meet the requirements of increased demand and those of increased usage. To achieve similar utility, a motorways services might need a 50-100 MW supply or even more.

We are looking at small power station levels of power here. Enough to run a small city.

Now multiply this for all current filling stations all over the country. serving say 30,000,000 cars

In the Rainbow Unicorn matrix world, all a politician with a classics degree needs to do is sign a pice of paper and it will be done.

Back in the real world however, I really cant see it.

Even if we built the 30 or more Sizewell B's that would need to operate flat out to meet this overall increase in daily electricity demand we would still have to massively increase the capacity of the entire electrical distribution system. Not just at national grid level but right down to door to door domestic level.

And to try to achieve this using mainly/only "Renewables", especially at a time when there is also pressure to replace gas with electricity for space heating is utter fantasy.

What all this illustrates is the extent to which most people grotesquely underestimate the massive utility that we get from fossil fuels and the near insurmountable task it will be to find an even only reasonably practical alternative.

And no. Hydrogen is not going to do it either It is a rotten fuel for transport vehicles, fine for rockets (Though even then not always) but rotten for transport generally.

:(
 
Associate
Joined
27 Aug 2003
Posts
2,231
Look the King has no clothes on...
Theres no way electric vehicles will ever be viable, for starters they are far from emission free, they only move the pollutants elsewhere.

to methods that are cleaner and have potential of being MUCH better in the long run than burning fossil fuel.

The best industrial power tool batteries last around 3 years, 5 at max.

Most EV's are showing far better lifespans than predicted showing that most people don't deep cycle their batteries on a daily basis thus prolonging their life. Ive seen crazy quotes of around 30 years. I'd like to think that 10 - 15 is generally where they will stop being useful in cars.

after this point tho, they will be used as grid level storage of home power, once again reducing impact and wastage.

They loose capacity from the first use.

They sure do, and engines start to wear after first use. Nothing is 100% resistant to wear. but so far, EV's seem to fair a lot better than ICE.

I would basically forget this white elephant and wait for the future alternative, whatever that will be.

You are more than welcome to.

Sure current users of EV are enjoying them, but that’s only because so few people are using them.

You should go for a test drive in one, however I don't think you'd be honest with yourself. Even if you did like it you seem to already have made up your mind.

The load on the national grid will be crippling alone if all internal combustion engines where replaced.

This has been addressed and actually most people charge their cars over night where grid draw is less anyway. Not only that, but the next phase will see users able to sell electricy from their cars back to grid. This means that in very high peak demand areas the car batteries will be able to stabilise the grid. Not ONLY that, but the infrastructure can be a lot less as you don't need such high capacity infrastructure from the power stations across the country to where it is needed as the peak will be taken more locally.

It just doesn’t make any logical sense.

I'd suggest having a read of more EV positive related news / information. It will be quite a shift.
 
Back
Top Bottom