Soldato
I already read the link.
That's why I put what you missed out. And the reason you missed it out in your post in your link about CNN
"omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes"
That you SJWs
Donald Trump
- Thread starter wez130
- Start date
- Status
I already read the link.
That's why I put what you missed out. And the reason you missed it out in your post in your link about CNN
"omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes"
That you SJWs
I already read the link.
That's why I out what you missed out. And the reason you missed it out post in your link about CNN
"omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes"
That you SJWs
What are talking about? They have a definition for how they rate each site. I simply didnt include the definitions for each.
I didnt include the defintion of "questionable source ' for Breitbart either.
I gave you the links to read for both and gave you the same sections from each in the post.
Did you expect me to copy and paste the entire page for both!?
Caporegime
What the blue hell you gibbering about?? What has this got to do with my religion??This is the thing.
A religious person like you can't see the bigger picture of what is happening.
Your kind never will
Oh I forgot that you are the resident islamophobe/racist on this forum
. But for hilarity purposes please do tell me what this so called bigger picture is. I do need a good laugh at your kind
.To be fair, that's all leftist sites that's going to tell you what you want to hear.
I already read the link.
That's why I put what you missed out. And the reason you missed it out in your post in your link about CNN
"omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes"
That you SJWs
Surely choosing not to report something and choosing to report something which is false as a fact are not equivalent
Permabanned
You all probably claim the BBC is biased when its highly regarded, worldwide, as relatively unbiased and factual.
There are also differences between reporting the news and opinion pieces.
Why dont we make a list of unbiased factual news sources that are backed up by several reviews from various sources?
There are also differences between reporting the news and opinion pieces.
Why dont we make a list of unbiased factual news sources that are backed up by several reviews from various sources?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ought-to-go-to-jail-over-durham-investigation
But it's only tang0 that comes up with these ridiculous mental illness fuelled conspiracies, not government officials with access to classified info
But it's only tang0 that comes up with these ridiculous mental illness fuelled conspiracies, not government officials with access to classified info
Associate
Trump 2020 - Let's make America even greater Donald.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
- Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180
Soldato
AAQ
Oh get a grip ffs. AP and Reuters are leftist
Compared to the extreme right yeah maybe they are but then anything left of that is isn't it.
Oh get a grip ffs. AP and Reuters are leftist
Compared to the extreme right yeah maybe they are but then anything left of that is isn't it.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 28,907
Reuters??
Soldato
See this is the problem. Unless it's Fox, Breitbart, Washington Examiner or the like its leftist. For anyone to call Reuters or AP leftist shows how twisted their view point is.
CNN is not one of them. Far-left and mostly un-factual.
Actually, they are rated as mostly factual
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/
Do you have an opposing set of correlated data that says otherwise?
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2018
- Posts
- 1,304
Putting side whether they are 'factual' or not it should be clear to anyone with a clue that CNN is not even remotely close to being far left, the fact you think its far-left shows that you don't understand the first thing about what 'far-left' is. Im not sure even the likes of tang0 etc would claim CNN is far left. They are corporate as hell and their long history of reporting shows they clearly back more centre left politicans over far left ones. They are also very critical of far-left groups like ANTIFA. They are very much pro establishment and if that's what you think the far-left are about then you really should just give up on talking politics.
Last edited:
Indeed. In fact the "far left" are constantly complaining about CNN's coverage of Bernie.
They are certainly left leaning/biased, but not far left.
You would have to look at something like this for a far left source ( this is more like the liberal version of Breitbart):
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/liberal-examiner/
Last edited:
Soldato
https://www.adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/?v=402f03a963ba
Here’s a handy chart for you all
Here’s a handy chart for you all
The TDS is strong in this thread
Never mind the 2020 which is already a lock for Trump due to utterly pathetic candidates from the Democrats that fall over themselves like drunks to out-woke each other, the real derangement is coming when that blonde daughter of his is going to be the first female president. You know it's coming!
Agreed, too much TDS from the Trump supporters in here.
Bookies have kim kardashian the red hot favourite to be the first female POTUS. Sorry to disappoint you.
Soldato
Could he be any more shallow? Tweeting about a picture of himself he calls fake even though it's on Getty. He's like the girls now who fake tan, draw on massive eye brows and pout into camera on Instagram. He looks ridiculous but his fragile ego can't take people laughing at him. Don't paint your face orange then Donny, its really that simple.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 7,586
Solid grounds for the next impeachment attempt!
- Status