That is in no way good enough if you expect a mass adoptation of EV's.
Has anyone ever claimed the infrastructure is in place to support mass adoption?
To meet the 2035 target, two key pieces of charging infrastructure need to be rolled out. First, high speed rapid chargers are needed along major routes. These will serve to boost the effective range of BEVs to 180% to 240% of their normal range (I'm assuming few will have patience for more than two rapid charges on a given journey). Right now, it's early days for these chargers. But Ionity, for example, are building them fairly quickly. And the second; daily charging solutions are needed for those without driveways. There are a number of solutions being trialed in the UK. But mass rollout will require legislation to make installation easier for the businesses providing these chargers.
The rest is of debatable importance (including most of the public chargers installed to date). It might be nice to plug in at Sainsbury's while doing the weekly shop. But if you drive a 250 mile range BEV, live a few miles up the road, and have a driveway with a charger, it's unlikely to be important. If V2G becomes a big thing, and even better, V2G via wireless chargers, then installation in supermarket car parks (etc.) may become more important.
But surely the infrastructure discussion shouldn't be limited to the practically of where you charge?
Where is all this additional energy to service these charge points coming from? This includes home charging...
If we need to invest in more power stations (renewable or not - another discussion!), then we better get cracking on with it now?
The UK has a fair amount of spare generation capacity. What it doesn't have is vast amounts of spare peak generation capacity. Building more generation capacity to accommodate a higher peak would be expensive and wasteful, hence the proposed solution is to manage demand instead.