Unless they thought you were affiliated with the sport, or thought you were dark betting the events it doesn't make any sense for them to ban you.
Of course it does, to them. It depends on the approach of the book some will value sharp players/handicappers for price discovery. Some are acting more like a market/intermediary and recognise that.
Most don’t though, most bookies don’t like winners* and will ban them or limit them to comically low limits (better PR than just banning) as they seem them as taking profits that should be theirs/don’t believe they need them as they’re not running an exchange but rather they're on the other side of all bets.
Exchanges have some of this dynamic too even - as unlike a proper regulated exchange in say finance sports betting exchanges are a bit more like the Wild West with liquidity provision and potentially more actively undertaken by the exchanges themselves - this provides obvious conflicts of interest. Profitable third party participants could face additional charges or be banned depending on their activities.
*by winners I mean people who have actually got an edge, not someone who has in the short term happened to be in profit/someone who has gotten lucky against the odds but who, if they carried on, would still be a loser or be placing -EC bets in the long run.
