So what you've just shown there is obsolete technology regresses in price, which is why AMD's older kit costs less than the new stuff. Intel's kit however retains its "value" because it's the same old regurgitated twaddle. The 6700K and 7700K are the same chip. The 8700K and the 9700K are the same chip. You just gotta pay the Intel motherboard tax.
Similarly, you've also shown how Intel continue to price gouge. 14nm is practically pennies to produce now and yet Intel increase prices for the same rehashed CPU.
So yeah again, lolwhut?
Listen, neither AMD, nor Intel, nor nVidia want anything more than as much of your money as they can possibly get.
They aren't your friends. They aren't making chips for the benefit of mankind, because they see it as their calling in life, or because they want to put affordable technology in your hands. They don't care about you, or me, or any of us.
That's all hippy nonsense, and no company with shareholders thinks of anything but profit and returns. None of them.
AMD charge less/give better value
when they need to to drive sales, and because of their position as the underdog fighting to gain market share.
Intel charges what it does because it can, because of its dominant position.
I think people have a tendency to put AMD and other underdog companies on a pedestal; to assume that they are the "good guys". There's no such thing in business.
We've seen AMD take the **** when the roles were reversed. It could happen again.
Please, see brand loyalty for what it is - heart ruling head.