Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
29 May 2006
Posts
5,347
Oh dear oh dear oh dear

Multiple unmaskings just as we knew all along. Biden involved, who claimed he wasn't aware of the investigation of Flynn

Joe Biden unmasked Flynn on Jan 12, 2017. What is so important about this date? It’s the same day the Washington Post publishes the David Ignatius opinion piece story about General Flynn’s calls with Kislyak. This is where the Logan Act setup the FBI started!

November 30, 2016, Samantha Power's first unmasking, this was the same day as the Department of Justice sending a letter to Flynn about his work with Flynn Intel Group and Inovo BV being scrutinised.

December 2, 2016, Samantha Power's 2nd unmasking and James Clapper's 1st unmasking, this was either the same day - or the day after - a 20 minute Trump Tower meeting between Flynn, Kushner and Ambassador Kislyak, which Kislyak reported to his superiors - which was intercepted.

December 14, 15, 16, 2016 will probably be about Sheikh al-Nahyan and George Nader meeting with Flynn, Kushner and Steve Bannon at Trump Tower on December 15.

December 28, 2016 would presumably have something to do with Inovo BV and Flynn Intel Group.

December 28, 2016 unmasking request most likely had to do with the Russian sanctions though, as Obama signed the executive order for them and Flynn and Kislyak spoke the same day.

January 5, 2017 unmasking request was obviously the Oval Office meeting, where Flynn was a main topic of conversation, because Obama and team wanted to hold off handing over intelligence to the Trump transition team because Russia.

January 10, 2017 CIA / CTMC request. SAME DAY AS DOSSIER REVEAL

January 11, 2017. Samantha Power has her final unmasking request the day after the dossier is revealed and the day before the Ignatius article on

January 12, 2017 for some final unmasking requests happened on the day of the Ignatius article, as well as when Horowitz opened an investigation into DOJ conduct and Lynch signing the "CIA Activities: Executive Order 12333" document.

Why did 5 random Treasury officials have the authority to unmask??



Oh dear oh dear oh dear I see you are still stuck in the past as a coping mechanisms to avoid thinking about how badly Trump is handling the virus and as a way to avoid admitting your many mistakes. None of that changes the fact Trump is destroying the economy, causing massive job loss's while causing massive deaths beyond what was predicated or needed. Trump is directly responsible for the terrible state of the US and responsible for making America weak and a joke.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Aug 2010
Posts
3,114
What is the crime ?

It is already known the CIA were tracking certain individuals of interest unfortunately these individuals also made contact with the Trump Campaign at which point their details got logged.


“There is nothing improper about asking to unmask the name of a US person in a classified intelligence report as long as the requester has authorization and a justified reason,” said Barbara McQuade, a law professor at the University of Michigan.

“If an unnamed US person were having suspicious communications with a foreign government, for example, then members of the intelligence community would have a duty to learn the person’s identity by requesting unmasking so that they could effectively assess the information,” McQuade added.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Oct 2007
Posts
12,085
Location
London, UK
What is the crime ?

It is already known the CIA were tracking certain individuals of interest unfortunately these individuals also made contact with the Trump Campaign at which point their details got logged.


“There is nothing improper about asking to unmask the name of a US person in a classified intelligence report as long as the requester has authorization and a justified reason,” said Barbara McQuade, a law professor at the University of Michigan.

“If an unnamed US person were having suspicious communications with a foreign government, for example, then members of the intelligence community would have a duty to learn the person’s identity by requesting unmasking so that they could effectively assess the information,” McQuade added.

Don't go hitting @tang0 with facts like that. He's down the rabbit hole and doesn't want to hear it. The fact Flynn broke the law and lied first to the VP and probably Trump before the FBI is irrelevant in his head.
 

mjt

mjt

Soldato
Joined
31 Aug 2007
Posts
19,999
Seriously, what am I missing here?
Crimes were suspected. People were investigated. Crooks were found guilty and sent to jail.

:confused:
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jun 2003
Posts
3,945
If Flynn wasn't the target of an investigation, why was his name keep getting unmasked? Don't you think it's curious that they did most of the unmaskings before the call with Kysliak which was SUPPOSEDLY the predicate for the investigation?

Why did Biden play dumb, when he was involved?

Flynn is tip of the iceberg stuff, lots more to come
 
Last edited:

mjt

mjt

Soldato
Joined
31 Aug 2007
Posts
19,999
If Flynn wasn't the target of an investigation, why was his name keep getting unmasked? Don't you think it's curious that they did most of the unmaskings before the call with Kysliak?

Why did Biden play dumb, when he was involved?

Flynn is tip of the iceberg stuff, lots more to come
He still broke the law, so does it matter?

If police had a warrant to search a house for drugs but instead found someone tied up and being held hostage in the basement and no drugs, would they just ignore it?
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
19,325
Location
Somewhere in the middle.
If Flynn wasn't the target of an investigation, why was his name keep getting unmasked? Don't you think it's curious that they did most of the unmaskings before the call with Kysliak?

Why did Biden play dumb, when he was involved?

Flynn is tip of the iceberg stuff, lots more to come

Let's say everything you say is all true and justice is served. Obama ends up in jail and you rejoice...

What will your opinion on Donald Trump be? Him alone. Base it purely on what your eyes see and your ears hear every time he's on display.

Just give us a real basic assessment of the guy.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jun 2003
Posts
3,945
He still broke the law, so does it matter?

If police had a warrant to search a house for drugs but instead found someone tied up and being held hostage in the basement and no drugs, would they just ignore it?

Literally no evidence he's guilty of anything
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Oct 2007
Posts
12,085
Location
London, UK
If Flynn wasn't the target of an investigation, why was his name keep getting unmasked? Don't you think it's curious that they did most of the unmaskings before the call with Kysliak?

Why did Biden play dumb, when he was involved?

Flynn is tip of the iceberg stuff, lots more to come

Well Flynn was calling the Russian ambassador and telling him they should vote for Israel in a upcoming UN vote while he was a private citizen. The US UN Ambassador would have heard about this and could and should have asked the name to be unmasked.

Honesty you are desperate for there to be something to this but there isn't. No one is going to be indicted. Flynn is a criminal who confessed in court. Hopefully the judge drags Barr in to explain himself.

As for Obamagate...

 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jun 2003
Posts
3,945
Flynn is a criminal who confessed in court

Confessed to what? Where's the evidence? Where's the original 302 that proves his guilt? Why is that 302 missing?

Why did the prosecutor and his previous lawyers say there was no brady material, but later found that they were hiding it?

Why did the FBI drop the investigation into Flynn stating there they found no derogatory evidence?

He only plead guilty to protect his son, as they had to get something on him (see released unredacted documents)

He withdrew the plea and the DOJ dropped the case

What's he guilty of?
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2002
Posts
2,738
Location
South UK
Meanwhile in the real world

US COVID-19 Deaths = 84,747
You wouldn't know what the real world was if it hit you in the face..

Those figures, from all over the world, have been massively massaged from the start. Also the regime to put people on vents ASAP was wrong and it probably killed more than it saved.

The field hospitals were never used! all of the projections were wrong, not just by a little but by an order of magnitude. This will be seen as the biggest over-reaction in the history of the world, causing recessions in the countries that followed the WHO's advice - advice that was massively flawed.

Flynn getting free is one step of many that need to happen, it's always the same protagonists behind the scenes pulling the strings and we are starting to see them unmasked.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Aug 2010
Posts
3,114
You wouldn't know what the real world was if it hit you in the face..

Got it, nothing to see here. A novel coronavirus variant causes no harm it’s just how we chose to deal with it that caused the deaths.

Thanks for clarifying, have you got a peer reviewed paper I could read please. It’s the only way I’ll learn to keep up.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2002
Posts
2,738
Location
South UK
Got it, nothing to see here. A novel coronavirus variant causes no harm
Didn't say that.

it’s just how we chose to deal with it that caused the deaths.
I didn't say all..

Thanks for clarifying,
No problem.

have you got a peer reviewed paper I could read please.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...-panacea-for-critically-ill-covid-19-patients here's the results of 3 studies..
Most coronavirus patients who end up on ventilators go on to die

It’s the only way I’ll learn to keep up.
I doubt you could as your bias is getting in the way.

Did you know in the US if the hospital diagnoses you as CV-19 they get $13,000? Also, if they then put then on a ventilator they treble that to $39,000? You can't see how that might be a reason to help massage figures and also killing people in the first place?
 

mjt

mjt

Soldato
Joined
31 Aug 2007
Posts
19,999
Didn't say that.

I didn't say all..

No problem.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health...-panacea-for-critically-ill-covid-19-patients here's the results of 3 studies..

I doubt you could as your bias is getting in the way.

Did you know in the US if the hospital diagnoses you as CV-19 they get $13,000? Also, if they then put then on a ventilator they treble that to $39,000? You can't see how that might be a reason to help massage figures and also killing people in the first place?
People are being put on ventilators because they need them, not because the hospital gets more money. Are you for real?
People aren’t dying because of the ventilators; people on ventilators are dying because the virus damages the lungs. Read the ******* article.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
48,796
Location
All over the world...
People are being put on ventilators because they need them, not because the hospital gets more money. Are you for real?
People aren’t dying because of the ventilators; people on ventilators are dying because the virus damages the lungs. Read the ******* article.
Lol don’t be silly, when has a trump supporter ever read anything ;).
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Aug 2010
Posts
3,114
Didn't say that.

I didn't say all..

No problem.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health...-panacea-for-critically-ill-covid-19-patients here's the results of 3 studies..

I doubt you could as your bias is getting in the way.

Did you know in the US if the hospital diagnoses you as CV-19 they get $13,000? Also, if they then put then on a ventilator they treble that to $39,000? You can't see how that might be a reason to help massage figures and also killing people in the first place?

Read the first paper: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30079-5/fulltext

YOUR conclusions are wrong, it’s all there in the paper you don’t even need to interpret.

Start with the APACHE II / Glasgow scores of the patients upon admission to ICU and remember a key symptom is ARDS.

You then take into account the oxygen per patient type and remember the patients with underlying health conditions prove to be fatal at higher rate.

Anyway, I’m not here to translate medical papers for you but if you’re going to throw around conclusions at least read the paper first.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Jul 2011
Posts
4,418
Location
Cambridgeshire
People are being put on ventilators because they need them, not because the hospital gets more money. Are you for real?
People aren’t dying because of the ventilators; people on ventilators are dying because the virus damages the lungs. Read the ******* article.

Whoa whoa whoa slow down chap, he may be on to something. Did you know that the death rate for Ebola patients who receive treatment is around 50%? It seems quite clear that ebola treatments are killing 50% of the patients they're used on. I mean....that's just maths. This whole modern medicine experiment is the biggest scandal in history.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom