Seems RAGE doesn't add much, the main gain is from SAM...
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/jk94g8/smart_access_memory_vs_sam_rage_mode_figures/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/jk94g8/smart_access_memory_vs_sam_rage_mode_figures/
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Nvidia to AMD
- Thread starter Petrolhead
- Start date
As mentioned, providing the independent reviews hold up ok then I'll be looking at one of the high-end ones seen in the video presentation.
I think the first thing I might be better off doing before shelling out for a card is changing the monitor to one which supports both FreeSync (2) and G-Sync, as well as also having a better panel for my needs - so probably IPS.
I think the first thing I might be better off doing before shelling out for a card is changing the monitor to one which supports both FreeSync (2) and G-Sync, as well as also having a better panel for my needs - so probably IPS.
6800XT/3080 would probably help you maintain 144fps in newer titles, my 1080Ti before I sold it had issues keeping up sometimes).
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 5,207
Me, probably. I am still using a GTX 970. I did not want to play the Nvidia price game.
From everything I've heard "RAGE" adds around 2-3% at best.
I'm interested in the smart access memory tech, but again is it dependent on
That aside, I don't really give a damn about raytracing at the moment. It's fantastic technology don't get me wrong, it's going to be a big part of future releases, but I don't see it being a huge thing for another 2-3 years by which point I'll be upgrading anyway.
Shame I won't get my hands on either this year eh haha.
I'll probably cancel the 3070. I'd imagine the 2080 would fetch 350ish so 170 for a upgrade of a few frame isn't value to me
Rage mode is just increasing the power limit a bit so the core clock stays at a higher speed. The gpu probably uses 320W in Rage mode which is acceptable for a small gain.
RT should gain traction since most coinsole games will use it for reflections or shadows. The performance seems acceptable from what I've in PS5 games. RDNA2 should be pretty good with RT since it's the same architecture used in the consoles. Also AMD is developing a 'super resolution' feature which will compete with DLSS so when RT is enabled it will not impact performance that much.
Waiting for the independant benchmarks of all cards. I've got a 1080ti at the moment which has been a great GPU, but I'll be doing a full system rebuild to update my outdated build - mainly for VR.
The AMD synergy between CPU and GPU looks interesting. Depending on stock levels, reviews and prices I'm aiming for Feb 2021 before I decide on a new system.
The AMD synergy between CPU and GPU looks interesting. Depending on stock levels, reviews and prices I'm aiming for Feb 2021 before I decide on a new system.
You might have more luck trying to buy from a physical shop that (I can't name here) only allows collection on these GPU's towards the end of November onwards.
A lot of interesting stuff going forward that's for sure.
As I said I think RT being a big part of future gaming is a given, I just don't see it being a requirement for another couple of years or so. While the new consoles support it we're also looking at a big lack of launch titles for both the new Xbox and PS5 as well as probably limited launches for the hardware itself, I expect Covid has set back a lot of things by at least a year and those issues are ongoing even now to certain degrees. I think we'll be looking at a lot of 'updated' games and potential delays on anything somewhat new, and I do believe that a lot of potentially intended launch titles were simply never mentioned due to setbacks.
We've tons of interesting technology hitting the market at a horrible time that nobody could have accounted for.
Soldato
I intend to switch out my 3080 for a 6900XT at the start of next year, if the following conditions are met.
- It is available to buy at MRSP $999
- The performance figures stack up - looking for 25% over 3080 in raster (**** RTX) @ 4k
- I don't need to invalidate the warranty to get 25% better performance
- I don't need to buy a new CPU to get 25% better performance
- The card performs at full throttle and doesn't exceed 75C at room temperature
- Drivers aren't a buggy mess
Soldato
If Saphire is doing a 6800XT I'll buy it cos I love their cards. But I'll be watching eagerly for aib reviews on YouTube. So yes 6800XT for me instead of Nvidia 3080.
The 3090 is only ~15% faster than the 3080, and to match the 3090 AMD had SAM/RAGE turned on, where the extra 10% will come from idk...
Soldato
It's a case of buying whatever is actually available I think.
If I can't get a 3070 I'll go AMD.
If I can't get a 3070 I'll go AMD.
I have a 3080 on the way and G-sync monitor. I also have a 3900x and a x570 motherboard.
I will try to resist but I think by early next year I will give Ryzen 3 and a 6800XT a go(as long as reviews back up the AMD presentation). More out of shiny shiny syndrome.
Part of me does think AMD are tying me in to their eco system, but I bought G-sync so who am I to think that
I will try to resist but I think by early next year I will give Ryzen 3 and a 6800XT a go(as long as reviews back up the AMD presentation). More out of shiny shiny syndrome.
Part of me does think AMD are tying me in to their eco system, but I bought G-sync so who am I to think that
Associate
I do recommend the LG 27GN950-b.
Although, I wish they also made a '-w' version because my office room is small. I need everything light or white to avoid it feeling like a 'room of gloom'
I'm long passed my teenage goth years of everything-in-morbid-black hah!Cheers, I'll bear that in mind. Screens are a bit of a minefield to me, so there's lots of research to be done.
LG has caught my eye a few times of late, so they are among the favoured choices at the mo.
Part of me does think AMD are tying me in to their eco system, but I bought G-sync so who am I to think that
I find it sort of interesting that there's a bit of a turn around in that regard.
AMD is in a unique position when it comes to their new memory technology, while Intel is looking at launching their own GPU's I don't think anyone expects them to be any good at launch (Whenever/if that happens) and Nvidia simply doesn't have a comparable product in terms of CPU's.
I see it as the following:
1. Intel and Nvidia are forced to adopt some sort of open source technology similar to what AMD is doing.
2. They work together to do something similar in opposition to AMD.
3. They ignore it.
Lets face it, the number 2 option is never going to happen and number 3 would be a bit awful for everyone. It's a situation where AMD has two tech superpowers on the back foot to the point where they need to work with them rather than against them.
Interesting times.