• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia Re-Size Bar/SAM support is live for some cards, more in March - 10% performance gains

Associate
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Posts
1,099
Location
Not Coventry
Just updated the vBIOS and installed the latest drivers on my 3060 Ti without any problems.

A quick run of the Borderlands 3 benchmark (DX12, Badass quality, motion blur off) went from 77.71 FPS to 84.53 FPS, can't complain about an 8.8% increase.



edit -

Found an old benchmark score (Ultra High) from AC:Valhalla: 68FPS to 72FPS, which is 5.9% increase.
 
Last edited:
Permabanned
Joined
21 Feb 2021
Posts
474
Here are my own benchmarks with ryzen 2700x and rtx 3070

Cyberpunk 2077 benchmarks

Witout RBAR
1920x1080 Preset Medium: 75.3
1920x1080 Preset Ultra: 72.2
1920x1080 Preset RT Medium: 53.2
1920x1080 preset RT medium + DLSS quality: 68.2
2560x1440 Preset Medium: 73.6
2560x1440 Preset Ultra: 53.4
2560x1440 Preset RT Medium: 35.4
2560x1440 Preset RT Medium + DLSS Quality: 53.8
With RBAR
1920x1080 Preset Medium: 79.6 (%5.7)
1920x1080 Preset Ultra: 76.4 (%5.8)
1920x1080 Preset RT Medium: 56 (%5)
1920x1080 preset RT medium + DLSS quality: 66.7 (-%0.97) [cpu bottleneck]
2560x1440 Preset Medium: 76.2 (%3.5)
2560x1440 Preset Ultra: 55.1 (%3.1)
2560x1440 Preset RT Medium: 36.4 (%2.8)
2560x1440 Preset RT Medium + DLSS Quality: 55.8 (%3.7)

Valhalla Benchmarks

Without RBAR
1080p Ultra = 81
1440p Ultra = 66

With RBAR
1080p Ultra = 86 (%6.1)
1440p Ultra = 69 (%4.5)

1440p no rbar

YXC0vVa.png
1440p rbar
wmxArEc.png


1080p no rbar

QADiZVc.png

1080p rbar

daKrqwK.png

have to say, cyberpunk felt somewhat snappier than before. %1 and %0.1 lows were also a lot tighter and closer to average fps. but i bet improvements would be overall higher with a 5000 series cpu
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Feb 2015
Posts
12,621
I wont be rushing after checking the games supported, I dont own or play any of the tiny list of games they have enabled, waiting for support for jrpg's etc. They seem to be prioritising AAA titles. :(
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Jul 2003
Posts
30,062
Location
In a house
I wont be rushing after checking the games supported, I dont own or play any of the tiny list of games they have enabled, waiting for support for jrpg's etc. They seem to be prioritising AAA titles. :(

Neither will i, even when i get a 30 series, as looks like the resize, works best at 1080p, im at 3440x1440, so can live with out the extra frame, or the 2 extra ones (judging by the above 1440p results with the bar) :p
 
Caporegime
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Posts
31,045
Well it works on my b450 tomahawk with my 2600 (3080 FE)

Great improvement in cyberpunk @3440x1440, staying more often at 50+ fps now in the really busy areas (max settings and ray tracing on with dlss set to quality) and not dropping to high 30s/low 40s anywhere as much in those CPU intensive areas. Even outside the intensive areas where FPS is about 70+, it's improved.
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Aug 2014
Posts
5,963
Is there any performance increase?not touching me PC new feature or not .
I'm waiting too until the bugs have been ironed out as my system is rock solid stable now. Some BIOS versions for my Gigabyte X570 Master have been finicky with my 3600MHz RAM too.

I think I'll wait for final versions using AGESA 1.2.0.2 which will probably come in a couple of months, 1.2.0.1 patch A is still only in beta BIOSes.

I am very interested to see the performance results though and how it compares to AMD's SAM.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
30 Aug 2014
Posts
5,963
Can you explain what this means? Sorry those things don't mean anything to me.
You need to enable Above 4G Decoding and Resizeable Bar in the BIOS and disable CSM in the BIOS (a compatibility mode for older hardware). Just be aware that disabling CSM will render your system unbootable if your Windows was installed using the old partitioning method called MBR.
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Aug 2014
Posts
5,963
OK so I can see that my disk is using GPT. I have found the setting in the BIOS to change from UEFI to CSM. Why do we need to change to an older version of the BIOS interface to use this? Seems a bit of a BIOS gimp.
You've got to disable CSM not enable it. It's good that your disk is using GPT.

If CSM is already disabled then that is not the issue.
 
Back
Top Bottom