Why you SHOULD be using Firefox

Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,052
Didn't think it would make any difference as I have clean installs on other devices doing it as well but even resetting Firefox and starting from scratch isn't solving the problem with pages loading - though it has sorted most of the other issues I've had arise with the 89 update (other than the UI is still meh).
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Dec 2003
Posts
3,585
Location
UK
Give these about:config changes a try maybe:

Code:
network.prefetch-next  false
network.predictor.enabled  false
network.dns.disableIPv6  true 
network.dns.disablePrefetch true
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
10 Jul 2010
Posts
6,298
Something that has pleased me about this new version, is the fact can increased the number of rows shown in the drop down addrees bar when you click it to show you frequently visited sites.

I've increased browser.urlbar.maxRichResults to 20 and in Settings > Home > Firefox Home Content Shortcuts, changed the number of rows to 3.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Dec 2012
Posts
4,090
Ive had issues with the Brave browser lately, it sometimes freezes, crashes and takes ages reloading and for the past 2 weeks youtube crashes on it any suggestions for a replacement ?
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Dec 2003
Posts
3,585
Location
UK
You can alter the Firefox UI though. It's not that straight forward for people with zero coding experience but most people can follow a guide. You can even just plonk someone else's custom css into a folder if you like the modifications they have made.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Aug 2007
Posts
9,704
Location
Liverpool
But you shouldn't have to. You should have a choice. That they do not give you a choice, means i have disabled all future updates.

I still like Firefox, but i don't like anything forced upon me.

That's a poor solution. No security updates, on a web browser?... What UI customisation choices do you get with, say, Chrome(ium)? I was a diehard compact mode user for years, but after a couple of weeks the new Proton UI has really grown on me, even on my 720p ancient mid-2012 MacBook Pro screen. It's sleek and helpful without getting in the way.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Aug 2007
Posts
9,704
Location
Liverpool
I only go on the websites of my bank, and the BBC. I reckon they are safe. You?

Unpatched in-the-wild remote exploits and financial transactions... What could go wrong? You may as well go the whole hog and install Firefox v2 for the full retro UI experience. Enjoy, and don't forget to post screenshots. :)

In all seriousness, if you need to ask (or seriously think that it's a safe thing to do) then you definitely are not cognisant of the potential dangers. It's not just what sites *you* visit. By that I mean it doesn't matter how 'safe' the bank/BBC/gayporn.com is. If YOU are compromised, your whole machine is exploited - and so is your whole network. Everything you do on them (regardless of the website you visit) is compromised.

By the way, the 'safe' BBC was serving up drive-by malware in hidden iframes as recently as 2011. What you're proposing isn't just a bad idea, it's ludicrous and unintelligent. Do some reading and stay up to date.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Aug 2007
Posts
9,704
Location
Liverpool
I've only been visiting the BBC since 2012 so i'm ok.

I don't need to install Firefox v2, i'm happy with this version.

I didn't ask.

I've been online since..a very long time, and never had any problems. maybe it's just you? Maybe you haven't got something set up correctly?

Fatuous and trolling answers are all well and good, but unless you're sealioning you're the one talking about doing something silly. You're probably running Windows, too?...

I didn't say I had any problems - I said your plan will lead to *you* having problems. Appeal to authority (or age) is all well and good, but I'm almost as old as you and have been using and programming the web and other Unix based software for most of it. That at least lets me know that running vulnerable software in a public facing role is a terrible idea, especially something with tentacles as wide reaching and deeply embedded as a modern browser. I've been crossing the road (and driving on it) for most of my life without incident, so by your logic I'll surely never be run over or crash. So, that's good news! :D

Since you're so old school and educated, I assume you evaluated but for whatever discounted switching to ESR to retain the current desired feature set while still receiving security patches? Firefox v90 patched ~10 exploitable CEVs and the exploit version history shows similar time after time. Chrome(ium) browsers don't fare any better. How long before your browser is just a piece of Swiss cheese between you and your bank (read: money)? *shrug*

All that risk over a UI? Just tweak the code and make it how you like (after all those years of experience online you've surely picked up some skills by now), or switch to another browser. It's just not worth it.
 

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
100,293
Location
South Coast
You're not just browsing BBC and your bank sites though, you're browsing here too, as well as countless other sites. Anyone that says they only browse two types of websites online is lying. How about stop risking online safety and actually stay up to date? Browser addons do not offer the same level of security as a current patched up application. If you believe they do then you're not really as clued up as you'd assume, this is a fact not just an opinion, I have no issue with pulling people up on things that are outright I have no issue with pulling people up on things that just don't make any logical sense.

Your call.... but you are on a forum where people are highly technical and in the know about security and technology. It is only normal for people to raise questions as to why this behaviour is happening.because it is not the norm and is somewhat dubious.
 
Back
Top Bottom