The graphics I’d say might not look as good as they could. Doubling the player count probably constrains them a lot.
*** The Official Battlefield 2042 thread***
- Thread starter jonneymendoza
- Start date
The graphics I’d say might not look as good as they could. Doubling the player count probably constrains them a lot.
Depends what you want when playing, some turns down settings due to game engine looks great even at lower settings.
You want a good cpu for this game, might really take advantage of those 16 core amd cpus.
you can turn on ray tracing and the game looks pretty but you be dead with the framerates you have.
DICE game engine makes game look great, crap isn't the word I use.
Netcode could be an issue but having massive battles, works for me
Guaranteed to be, even in bfv if you watch planes flying in the air they will randomly stall and appear further away suddenly. I can’t see that improving with 2x the player count,
Don't forget DG sitting in spawn spamming motars.
Soldato
Looks like absolute turd.
Play cod then
That is called dsync
Soldato
Play cod then
That's even ******* worse.
Associate
I really enjoyed the footage. Obvs heavily edited to show exactly what they wanted, I got a good vibe for ‘fun’ and it looked amazing
long way to go before release but thumbs up so far.
long way to go before release but thumbs up so far.
which seems to be an issue in almost every game of bfv I’ve played in, though only really noticeable in planes.
wonder if mortars will be in it.
Caporegime
Gameplay video looks pure hot garbage. Ill play the open BETA with very low expectations, never know it might surprise me.
The demo "beta" is the way to go then see how it goes from there, though usually the demo "beta" has a pretty crap map in it.
I do think that some maps are going to be very clustered and some a bit sparse as they'll likely go a bit overboard for the new player count.
Wouldn't shock me to see metro yet again returning as dice think it's a "popular map", when the reality is it's a terrible map that only gets used for faster rank ups.
I do think that some maps are going to be very clustered and some a bit sparse as they'll likely go a bit overboard for the new player count.
Wouldn't shock me to see metro yet again returning as dice think it's a "popular map", when the reality is it's a terrible map that only gets used for faster rank ups.
Yup
Soldato
You know what over a year I have not been playing online FPS games I have had my hopes this would be decent but the two trailers released just isn't doing it for me 
I will wait till I play it before making my mind up.
The highlight of the Xbox E3 was Halo infinite online trailer I can get behind that.
I will wait till I play it before making my mind up.The highlight of the Xbox E3 was Halo infinite online trailer I can get behind that.
Associate
Was happily surprised with halo, looked like it was back to its roots!You know what over a year I have not been playing online FPS games I have had my hopes this would be decent but the two trailers released just isn't doing it for me
The highlight of the Xbox E3 was Halo infinite online trailer I can get behind that.
Soldato
Two thoughts from watching the trailer:
1. 128 players is going to mean the CPU requirements for this are going to be (I assume) quite high.
2. Again 128 players might bring more of a Planetside 2 vibe to the game. Especially as it's futuristic too.
It looks good. Reminds me a lot of BF3 and BF4. Especially that skyscraper.
1. 128 players is going to mean the CPU requirements for this are going to be (I assume) quite high.
2. Again 128 players might bring more of a Planetside 2 vibe to the game. Especially as it's futuristic too.
It looks good. Reminds me a lot of BF3 and BF4. Especially that skyscraper.