Is general browsing now just a messy pile of ****?

Joined
12 Feb 2006
Posts
17,223
Location
Surrey
The other day I was searching about lawn care, and Google being the nice guy that it is, now has realised I am interest in lawn care, so on my Google now page (or whatever its called on mobiles) there is a website with a title that interested me to click and read it, but I stupidly forget every time it's just not worth doing as website browsing these days is just pure crap.

This is the site I was linked to.

https://m.salisburypost.com/2020/09...n-important-part-of-regular-lawn-maintenance/

Is there actually any content on there other than the title? It's just other click bait articles, primarily that tabola service I see it but there's plenty copy cats where they have junk titles made for click bait, and when you view the site it's just adverts every where, some taking so long on purpose that the "next" button they force you to use moves as you go to click it and end up clicking on an advert.

You also have cookie consent, sometimes requiring more than 1 click. Then there's pop ups to get you to allow notifications from that site (does anyone say yes to this?)

I hate it. This feels like my experience now for so many articles. It's daily I come across this junk.

Anyone else feeling this too?

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I feel it started to get worse the moment Google chrome became so popular on mobiles , and Google wanting you to see ads, didn't put good ways for adblockers, and now it's allowed a new breed of ad styles to grow.
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Jan 2016
Posts
8,768
Location
Oldham
I don't like the amount of adverts on webpages. Some are big banners that will appear after a minute of being on the page. It will appear on every story page on the news site.

More annoyingly is some sites notice when an adblocker is in action and will block the whole site until its turned off. So its either turn adblocker off and get hit by a mass of adverts or click away from the site.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
More often than not, all the top web results on google are trying to sell you something. Especially when you make the dreaded mistake of searching: “top rated XYZ”

There are loads of ‘prosumer review’ websites that profit off web traffic and commission links. It’s just utter crap.

Add in the mind melting tedium of accepting / declining cookies and, yeah, it’s a chore.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
5 Dec 2003
Posts
20,999
Location
Just to the left of my PC
I found that not using Google was a significant improvement. I use DuckDuckGo (silly name, great service) for searching. Unlike Google, DuckDuckGo actually is a search engine. Google is spyware and advertising that uses a search engine as a tool to manipulate its targets (i.e. everyone who uses it).

A script firewall works for me, but it does (like any firewall) add more for you to do as you have to choose which sources are allowed to run scripts on your computer. It also solves the advertising problem, which is now (as you say) deliberately designed to make your time online much worse and to mislead you into things. Advertising is now actively hostile online as well as being a security risk, so I have no qualms about blocking it by default.

Even so, I do sometimes encounter sites that are just clickbait for content that doesn't even exist, solely to throw more adverts at you (while gathering as much information about you as possible).

Cookie consent I'm fine with. Better than not having consent at all. Besides, all the cookies in my browser self-destruct after 30s of not being used and whenever I close the tab that set them and whenever I close my browser. Which I've made a habit of doing frequently. Close/open takes a couple of seconds tops.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,101
Google is spyware and advertising that uses a search engine as a tool to manipulate its targets (i.e. everyone who uses it).

Noticed this lately - Google used to be great for trying to find a song from half-remembered lyrics, now it will try and promote certain songs based on matching a single word and you'll have to wade quite deep into the results or use another search engine to actually find what you are looking for :(

Same with other stuff it will use individual words from what you are searching for completely out of the context you are searching to try and push you towards certain results instead of what you are actually looking for :(
 
Associate
Joined
4 Jun 2020
Posts
2,401
Noticed this lately - Google used to be great for trying to find a song from half-remembered lyrics, now it will try and promote certain songs based on matching a single word and you'll have to wade quite deep into the results or use another search engine to actually find what you are looking for :(

Same with other stuff it will use individual words from what you are searching for completely out of the context you are searching to try and push you towards certain results instead of what you are actually looking for :(

Wrap the lyrics in quotes to get an exact match.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
10,951
Location
Bristol
Cookie consent I'm fine with. Better than not having consent at all. Besides, all the cookies in my browser self-destruct after 30s of not being used and whenever I close the tab that set them and whenever I close my browser. Which I've made a habit of doing frequently. Close/open takes a couple of seconds tops.

Are there any negative effects of that cookie policy?
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Posts
35,707
Indeed. Although they can be a right pain too, especially when Google/Youtube causes them to slow your browser to a crawl due to the sheer amount of crap being blocked. Go open the Youtube thread and watch the numbers go mental.

01NTdWx.png

That proves how much crap websites contain though. This is a fault of the main website and the tracking what they are doing. The blockers just flag up how much is been blocked.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
5 Dec 2003
Posts
20,999
Location
Just to the left of my PC
Are there any negative effects of that cookie policy?

Yes. Sometimes I am logged out of sites I'm logged into because a cookie holding relevant information has self-destructed. It's a minor issue as any even halfway competent site should handle that situation by bringing up the login window. For example, if I'm on those forums and the login cookie self-destructs while I am writing a post, when I click on the reply button I go to a screen stating "You must be logged in to do that" and giving me the standard login. I log in again and the message is posted. No problem. The only negative effect is the ~20 seconds it takes me to log in again.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Aug 2007
Posts
28,597
Location
Auckland
I metaphorically lose my poo poo when articles which I meant to click on actually appear (so, win) but there is embedded video which starts playing with the audio on (so, awful).

That is not cool beans my dude, not cool beans at all.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
12,396
Location
Birmingham
I metaphorically lose my poo poo when articles which I meant to click on actually appear (so, win) but there is embedded video which starts playing with the audio on (so, awful).

That is not cool beans my dude, not cool beans at all.

Even worse when it automatically air plays to the TV, which switches off whatever your kid was watching, resulting in a meltdown and subsequent loss of hair and hardening of coronary arteries.
 

G J

G J

Associate
Joined
3 Oct 2008
Posts
1,400
I metaphorically lose my poo poo when articles which I meant to click on actually appear (so, win) but there is embedded video which starts playing with the audio on (so, awful).

That is not cool beans my dude, not cool beans at all.

Remember the Smile Emoji banner/flash ad whatever it was that used to scream HEEELLLOOO!!!! at near full back in the day when ad blockers wernt a thing.

yeah people ran with that....
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,569
Location
Llaneirwg
I hate the cookie consent thing. Drives me mad.
No adblocker makes the Internet basically unusable. I wish this was an exaggeration but it isn't
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Dec 2012
Posts
17,507
Location
Gloucestershire
There's no doubt we've passed the pinnacle of the internet.

It's a ******* mess now. Just a generally awful experience, and notably worse than a decade+ ago.

That's objective truth, not rose tinted. There was fun to be had circa 2000, but the peak was probably late 2000s.
 
Back
Top Bottom