Geronimo the alpaca killed as legal row ends

Soldato
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Posts
10,714
Stop it, your compassion is reducing me to tears

Compassion for a pet would have the goalposts on greased rails. The owner couldn't have been more clear about their intent to obstruct and 4 years demonstrates that.

It was beyond this alpaca owner to have their animal destroyed and a mockery of disease control while tens of thousands of cattle (owned by emotionless farmers?) were destroyed in the UK due to bTB infection in that period.
 
Associate
Joined
19 Jul 2011
Posts
2,343
If the owner cared about the pet they should have handled the animal and brought it calmly to a vet for it to be euthanased. Instead they let a media circus and wild goose (alpaca?) chase happen instead, frightening the poor animal and risking the workers. Shocking behaviour for an animal lover.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
Compassion for a pet would have the goalposts on greased rails. The owner couldn't have been more clear about their intent to obstruct and 4 years demonstrates that.

It was beyond this alpaca owner to have their animal destroyed and a mockery of disease control while tens of thousands of cattle (owned by emotionless farmers?) were destroyed in the UK due to bTB infection in that period.
Isn't it still the case that BTB transmission vectors are very poorly understood... I wonder what actual risk this animal posed to any other.

I mean, they've culled thousands of badgers and they still have no idea if it had any effect at all.
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Mar 2009
Posts
6,590
Location
Nottingham
Simple facts are, the Alpaca has BTB following 2 tests. The owner doesnt want to lose her pet because she's being selfish which is understandable as its her pet. However....... she cries to the BBC to make a story about it, wastes the courts time twice and taxpayers money because she doesn't want to give up her pet. Rather than biting the bullet and getting it euthanised on her own terms she made a media circus of it hoping media pressue would make defra back down and she lost. Finally defra has done what they should and had to go in force with the fuzz because of the media circus she stirred up.

Simple fact is she put cattle herds and therefore humans at risk of TB so she was being incredibly short sighted and selfish.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Dec 2005
Posts
5,006
If the owner cared about the pet they should have handled the animal and brought it calmly to a vet for it to be euthanased. Instead they let a media circus and wild goose (alpaca?) chase happen instead, frightening the poor animal and risking the workers. Shocking behaviour for an animal lover.

yupp...hard to know exactly from the reports but a 'veterinary nurse' on a 'farm' should know better...

Geronimo has been in quarantine with five other alpacas on her farm in Wickwar, near Bristol since arriving in the UK in August 2017.
In the past four years the restrictions enforced on her alpaca farm mean she has been unable to trade livestock or receive any income from it.

no doubt she's attached to him but maybe not quite as simple as being a 'pet'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-57785542
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,770
Location
Wales
I get that farmers might be at risk but this is her pet. I would be mortified if someone wanted to destroy my dog and would fight to keep it alive


Eh? It was a stud animal on a farm. An expensive (and presumably uninsured) business investment not a pet.
 
Joined
18 Nov 2019
Posts
3,173
I really felt sorry seeing Geronimo being dragged off in the way he was. He must have been so frightened and confused.

I think a vet should have been able to go to him and done the procedure where he could be put to sleep feeling loved rather than being hauled off with lots of people around him.
 
Transmission breaker
Don
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
16,793
Location
In a house
The whole farce was created by the lady herself, and was very hard for the authorities to deal with as a result. The animal could have been destroyed/removed from the farm in a much more humane/quick/safe way had she not rallied the unwashed mob/nutters to block the way, and gone about every possible way of trying to block the sensible (but sad) destruction of an infected animal.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2005
Posts
12,444
The whole farce was created by the lady herself, and was very hard for the authorities to deal with as a result. The animal could have been destroyed/removed from the farm in a much more humane/quick/safe way had she not rallied the unwashed mob/nutters to block the way, and gone about every possible way of trying to block the sensible (but sad) destruction of an infected animal.

There's obviously a legal issue also if it can drag on for 4 years, they either should have allowed one final test before destruction to satisfy the owner and then had the animal euthanised in a less stressful way or had destroyed it 4 years ago after the last test turned up positive instead again in a non stressful way that put the animals welfare first
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,770
Location
Wales
There's obviously a legal issue also if it can drag on for 4 years, they either should have allowed one final test before destruction to satisfy the owner and then had the animal euthanised in a less stressful way or had destroyed it 4 years ago after the last test turned up positive instead again in a non stressful way that put the animals welfare first

But it wouldn't have satisfied the owner.
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Oct 2002
Posts
14,162
Location
Bucks and Edinburgh
Eh? It was a stud animal on a farm. An expensive (and presumably uninsured) business investment not a pet.

Ah ok, I saw an article on the news which made it look like a pet (photos together, having her arm round it etc.), I mistakenly took that to mean it was a pet, perhaps that was her intention to garner support.
 
Soldato
Joined
31 May 2009
Posts
21,257
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-58255378

Or is the owner just being dramatic when she knows full well this is normal procedure.

On the face of it, it seems quite harsh, was there nothing else that could be done? If the animal is living effectively in isolation on a farm, I'm not really seeing the danger it poses.

badger walks thru alpaca zone, badger gets the TB, badger infects all local herds, all local herds have to be destroyed
typhoid Mary the Alpaca
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Posts
4,694
Location
Wiltshire
Not true, every farmer I know has an emotional attachment to their herd. The hardest of farmers still have favorites and "pets" that their children helped to raise. Even more so with dairy herds where the farmer will probably have helped deliver many of them. They are not just a source of income.

Yea im sure... just look at Clarkson, he was well upset when a lamb died and said he "loved" his sheep.... and they arrive back chopped up, wrapped in plastic and hes not bothered one bit :confused:
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Posts
24,529
Location
Solihull-Florida
Soldato
Joined
19 Mar 2009
Posts
3,516
Location
Hereford
Yea im sure... just look at Clarkson, he was well upset when a lamb died and said he "loved" his sheep.... and they arrive back chopped up, wrapped in plastic and hes not bothered one bit :confused:
Its more than possible to grow attachment to an animal you are raising for food but still understand what needs to be done.

I was pretty upset seeing my 4 pigs go into the abattoir, but they were always going to be butchered for meat, and what the hell would I do with 4 full size giant pigs down the line.

I cry my tears into sausage sandwiches.
 
Back
Top Bottom