Help with choosing CPU/Mobo bundle

Associate
Joined
23 Aug 2021
Posts
84
Location
Southampton
Hey everyone,

I'm looking at upgrading my current system

i5-2500k [email protected]
EVGA Superclocked GTX1070

I have the option to purchase one of these bundles for roughly the same price (£350) but I really dont know which one is best or if they are even worth it. My machine is primarily for gaming.

Z390 Pro + I7-9700k (+cooler) + 32Gb Memory
or
Z490-H + I7-10700k (no cooler or memory)
or
ASUS TUF B550 + 3700X (stock cooler, no memory)

If I buy either of the Intels, I will need a new PSU because my current one does not have the extra 4 pin motherboard connector.

Are these worth it?
Should I be looking at something else?
Should I wait until the next gen AMD's get released so the older CPUs drop in price?

I'm not in any rush to upgrade but if there is a deal to be had then ill go for it.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
11,689
Location
Uk
I'd wait a month for Intel 12 gen release and see how that performs, at the very least you'll probably find the current Intel and AMD parts receive a price cut.

The extra 4 pin is only for LN2 overclocking so only the 8 pin is needed.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
23 Aug 2021
Posts
84
Location
Southampton
I'd wait a month for Intel 12 gen release and see how that performs, at the very least you'll probably find the current Intel and AMD parts receive a price cut.

The extra 4 pin is only for LN2 overclocking so only the 8 pin is needed.

Thanks for the reply. If the prices do drop, im still unsure which of these options would be best.
 
Associate
Joined
12 Jun 2021
Posts
1,663
Location
Leeds
Either wait a month to see what Intel bring to table and see if that is worthwhile or drops other prices.

Imo none of those options are sensible and B550+5600x is a better option. Look for a bundle with 16gb of DDR4. Or a bundle with decent PSU included if you need a new one. You do not always need that extra 4 pin cable and will almost always work with just the 8 pin.
 
Associate
Joined
4 Oct 2019
Posts
2,169
Location
Belfast
Hey everyone,

I'm looking at upgrading my current system

i5-2500k [email protected]
EVGA Superclocked GTX1070

I have the option to purchase one of these bundles for roughly the same price (£350) but I really dont know which one is best or if they are even worth it. My machine is primarily for gaming.

Z390 Pro + I7-9700k (+cooler) + 32Gb Memory
or
Z490-H + I7-10700k (no cooler or memory)
or
ASUS TUF B550 + 3700X (stock cooler, no memory)

If I buy either of the Intels, I will need a new PSU because my current one does not have the extra 4 pin motherboard connector.

Are these worth it?
Should I be looking at something else?
Should I wait until the next gen AMD's get released so the older CPUs drop in price?

I'm not in any rush to upgrade but if there is a deal to be had then ill go for it.
Do you need 32 gigs of ram?

10700K bundle gets my vote but it’s up to you. Get a new PSU for now though and see if you can get a complete bundle (RAM CPU and mobo) for a very discounted price.
 
Associate
Joined
4 Oct 2019
Posts
2,169
Location
Belfast
My PSU is newer than my CPU, I would guess around 5 years old maybe less.



No not at all, its just that the bundle i was looking at on ebay came with it.

Why are you buying from eBay? What is the model of your PSU? Need exact model code. YOu can get variations between models within the same brand with the same specs and one can be a turd and the other can be amazing.
 
Associate
Joined
12 Apr 2020
Posts
1,966
The item has ended now, think it went for £360. RAM Speed was 2666Mhz
Well if that's off table I'd leave other two. If on a budget seen MSI B550 Gaming edge wifi up for grabs(says never been used)..no one bidding and will look at a bid...That's a great mobo. Pair that with a 5600x and you've got the basis of a great gaming machine
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Jun 2008
Posts
11,618
Location
Finland
PSU is a Corsair CX600M
That design was outdated low end already decade ago.
And while performance as new was good for budget, third tier C(r)apXon capacitors aren't good for longevity.
Measly 3 year warranty tells it wasn't designed to last in heavier use.
So would certainly plan on upgrading it inside year or two.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
23 Aug 2021
Posts
84
Location
Southampton
Well if that's off table I'd leave other two. If on a budget seen MSI B550 Gaming edge wifi up for grabs(says never been used)..no one bidding and will look at a bid...That's a great mobo. Pair that with a 5600x and you've got the basis of a great gaming machine

The 5600X is what i keep coming back to and think im just gonna have to dive in and do it.

That design was outdated low end already decade ago.
And while performance as new was good for budget, third tier C(r)apXon capacitors aren't good for longevity.
Measly 3 year warranty tells it wasn't designed to last in heavier use.
So would certainly plan on upgrading it inside year or two.

Yeah i know im gonna have to replace it at some point but while its working I dont have to worry about it.

Looking at upgrading myself too but can’t decide on AMD or intel.

Ive been edging towards AMD more than Intel but not ruling out Intel if something great comes along.
 
Associate
Joined
4 Oct 2019
Posts
2,169
Location
Belfast
Looking at upgrading myself too but can’t decide on AMD or intel.
Intel are a good budget build platform. Their high end offerings are not good value for money when compared to AMD.

AMD's lower spec CPUs are very expensive relative to Intel's offerings. That being said, the 5600X is an amazing CPU and is closer to the performance of an 8 core than a 6 core processor.

There are new B2 revisions coming from AMD so we may see a non X 5600 CPU come along. That being said, there's no such thing as a bad option these days, just bad value.
 
Associate
Joined
12 Apr 2020
Posts
1,966
Intel are a good budget build platform. Their high end offerings are not good value for money when compared to AMD.

AMD's lower spec CPUs are very expensive relative to Intel's offerings. That being said, the 5600X is an amazing CPU and is closer to the performance of an 8 core than a 6 core processor.

There are new B2 revisions coming from AMD so we may see a non X 5600 CPU come along. That being said, there's no such thing as a bad option these days, just bad value.

the new am4 5000 series with 3d v cache cpu are coming Q1 next year...they'll offer a 15% uplift in gaming compared to current 5000 series, so getting amd 5600x not a bad shout...upgrade path up to 5950x with the new 3d v cache further down the line. That'll outperform intel current offering in current gen upgrade paths....
or wait for alderlake. cpu can run with ddr4 as well as ddr5, so start with ddr4 and upgrade ram to ddr5 when price/performance improves. Be good to get an idea of the new mobo prices too
 
Associate
Joined
12 Jun 2021
Posts
1,663
Location
Leeds
is ddr5 going to be much better ?

In some circumstances DDR5 systems will be amazing whilst in others they may at first be worse. Gaming performance may be worse on DDR5 to start with but over time the DDR5 modules will get faster and have better timings and will improve.

Wait until Alderlake is in the hands of independent reviewers before making a decision on DDR5. Currently Intel will be cherry picking what to show and that will be the absolute best case scenarios for DDR5 and ADL and not the ones where they do badly.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Jun 2008
Posts
11,618
Location
Finland
is ddr5 going to be much better ?
For memory bandwidth intensive use it's clear performance step forward.
But for latency intensive use like gaming performance regression is likely.

While new memory type has always been at first slower in access time than good existing gen memory, DDR5's timings simply suck donkey balls:
For example this kit has 40 cycle primary timings for 4800MHz.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/team...00c40-4800mhz-dual-channel-kit-my-0an-tg.html
In absolute time that's same what 20 cycles would do at low end for DDR4 2400 MHz speed.
And that 20 cycles would be mediocre even for lot shorter cycle 3600 MHz DDR4:
3600MHz standard latency is 18 cycles and good memories are at 16 cycles.

So it's no wonder that Alder Lake+DDR5 has 90+ ns memory latency:
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/gear-4-mode-tested-on-alder-lake
(that's with monolithic die without Intel yet having chiplet design)

For comparison current DDR4 Intels run routinely at 50ns memory latency.
Also Ryzens achieve around 60ns with good memory.
And compared to Ryzens Alder Lake is also going to have small cache to try to mask memory latency: 32MB vs 64MB of higher Ryzens.
While at the same time AMD's Zen3 winter refresh with 3D stacked L3 is going to triple L3's size to 192MB.
 
Back
Top Bottom