Insulate Britain and Extinction Rebellion, domestic terrorists?

Soldato
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
22,219
Well you know how society tried to make smokers feel bad about smoking and it lead to the huge increase in smoking resulting in it being more common than ever?
What? Killing yourself out of protest is reserved for monks, not general citizens disgruntled at informative ads.

Edit: next do the morons and seatbelts
 
Associate
Joined
1 Mar 2004
Posts
1,987
Location
Warwickshire
They are one of the most annoying things to come out of 2021 so far.

It's the selfishness that grates the most. They are passionate about their cause, as are a lot of people.
But in their special, privileged world, of course they have the right to repeatedly inconvenience tens of thousands of people in the pursuit of drawing attention to it (and i'm not even sure what 'it' is - all houses that can be effectively & economically insulated pretty much have been - it isn't the 1970s)
 
Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,062
Location
Leeds
That is a textbook Karen(Ken). This is a peaceful protest, it is disruptive and that is its aim. And yes, censorship, murdering of protestors sounds kind of Nazi like to me.

It is a protest, disrupting of life is its aim. If people protest in the middle of nowhere then nobody cares, it doesn't get reported.

Yes, these fatties need to be shamed for their own good health.

So if I blockaded an A&E is it still a peaceful protest? In all seriousness where do you draw the line? Maybe I stop coal being delivered to a power station and a hospital loses power, where is terrorism and where is peaceful protest? If there is material damage or you are causing actual damage or risk to lives then your protest isn't peaceful. The actual intention is to block traffic which indirectly causes emergency services to be unable to operate, you're now causing risk of death and your protest is no longer valid, Police should forcibly remove and detain, repeated instances should result in detention of 30 days at a local Police station or prison where necessary. If the Police are failing to act responsibly then the UK government should call in the Army to maintain the peace and consider the protest an act of terror and Police should be reprimanded.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jan 2018
Posts
14,739
Location
Hampshire
In all seriousness where do you draw the line?

Not at blocking a road, they arent blockading A&E or power plants so those points are futile. FWIW I didn't agree with them saying they wouldn't let ambulances through. If we use your definition any protest would be banned as they all cause some disruption of risk of a delayed emergency response somewhere..
 
Soldato
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Posts
5,435
Location
Location, Location!
Is that it? No retort to the points made? Are we to assume censorship and murder is OK for you then?

What more is there to say, you label people Karen's, you seem to have convinced yourself that lying in-front of motorists is in some way peaceful and go around calling people Nazi's. It would appear it is you that better needs to justify yourself.

If those are your opinions then it is a waste of everyone's time.
 
Associate
Joined
16 Jun 2008
Posts
1,252
Well you know how society tried to make smokers feel bad about smoking and it lead to the huge increase in smoking resulting in it being more common than ever?

Ah yes, we should also implement a food ban in pubs etc. and a punitive tax on food, put massive health warnings on it and keep it out of sight.
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Oct 2006
Posts
12,456
Location
Sufferlandria
If there is material damage or you are causing actual damage or risk to lives then your protest isn't peaceful.

That's your own opinion and it's entirely irrelevant.
Legally, it is a peaceful protest. That's why the government needed to apply for an injunction. If it wasn't peaceful then it wouldn't be a legal protest and the injunction wouldn't be needed.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,062
Location
Leeds
Not at blocking a road, they arent blockading A&E or power plants so those points are futile. FWIW I didn't agree with them saying they wouldn't let ambulances through. If we use your definition any protest would be banned as they all cause some disruption of risk of a delayed emergency response somewhere..

It's not a road though, it's the M25, it's a critical part of transport for London, it isn't a minor inconvenience. If we were in a conventional style war, bombing motorways would be a pretty valid thing to do for example.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,784
Location
Wales
Justify? People are literally calling for censorship and murdering of protestors. If you find that acceptable you need to a quiet word with yourself tbh.

Tbf people are impotently expressing anger through hyperbole they aren't calling for anything seriously.

By taking it literally you come across either social incapable or a bit thick and so easily ignored
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jan 2018
Posts
14,739
Location
Hampshire
Tbf people are impotently expressing anger through hyperbole they aren't calling for anything seriously.

By taking it literally you come across either social incapable or a bit thick and so easily ignored

Not when they start trying to justify it, especially the censorship.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Dec 2002
Posts
3,961
Location
UK
murdering of protestors.

I'd call diving on the floor in the middle of the M25 attempted suicide rather than murder tbh.

And if they cause a pileup that kills what are effectively bystanders, then it's a murder suicide.

If they want to kill themselves, so be it.
 
Back
Top Bottom