Need more storage

Soldato
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
So folks, Im finding that with a 350mbit connection, more games, more family photos being taken I am running out of storage more quickly that I thought I would.

I currently have as follows:
3 drives. C System drive SSD @ 0.5TB, D Storage drive HDD @ 2TB, E Games drive SSD @ 2TB.

I understand solid state drives have limited read/write and not ideal for long term storage? (please correct me if I am wrong).

At the same time I would still like to have a "fast solid state" storage drives so I can edit photos etc, for faster drive access.

I would be interested to hear your thoughts and advice on this... e.g.

Should I perhaps go with a series of HDDs for more storage or perhaps one super big HDD?
And perhaps get a couple of SSDs/NVME drives?
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Oct 2009
Posts
13,839
Location
Spalding, Lincs
I understand solid state drives have limited read/write and not ideal for long term storage? (please correct me if I am wrong).

They do have a limited amount of writes, but the average consumer will never get close to this. Plus with that being the case, long term storage would mean they're being written to fairly infrequently. SSDs are absolutely fine for long term storage, but not always the best in terms of value.

Perhaps replace the 500GB with a 1/2TB SSD for OS and storage. Then add a 4-14TB drive as long term storage. That way you have a fair bit more SSD storage and can have a huge amount of HDD storage. A HDD is going to be fast enough for image editing anyway, it's not a drive intensive task at all.

At this point I would also suggest a decent backup is in place if not already, as is often overlooked :)
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
They do have a limited amount of writes, but the average consumer will never get close to this. Plus with that being the case, long term storage would mean they're being written to fairly infrequently. SSDs are absolutely fine for long term storage, but not always the best in terms of value.

Perhaps replace the 500GB with a 1/2TB SSD for OS and storage. Then add a 4-14TB drive as long term storage. That way you have a fair bit more SSD storage and can have a huge amount of HDD storage. A HDD is going to be fast enough for image editing anyway, it's not a drive intensive task at all.

At this point I would also suggest a decent backup is in place if not already, as is often overlooked :)

Thanks for the quick response andy_mk3!.

500GB drive = I would like to leave this untouched if I am being honest as my "system drive". Even if there is still space (Im considering this for future OS's etc).

Regarding 4-14TB drive, presumably an HDD of some kind? I would like to get a beefy HDD like this actually so I dont have to worry about storage. Any recommendations?

i suppose I could get another 2TB SSD as a psuedo games/data drive?

2TB NVME drive for games which I have can stay the same.

Incidentally what is the best bang for buck these in terms of SSD storage? Is 2TB still the sweet spot or could I go higher without paying too much premium at 4TB for eg?
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
Thanks andy_mk3.

Actually I dont mind going even bigger on the HDD, but from risk point of view am I better off splitting the HDDs? or just going for one big one?
I know you mentioned the 8TB one in the link, I dont mind going higher e.g. 12TB?
E.g. https://www.overclockers.co.uk/wd-g...atacenter-hard-drive-wd121kryz-hd-54y-wd.html
(are these WD Gold drives overkill? any difference to the one you mentioned earlier?)

And then separately I might pick up another 2TB SSD/M.2/NVME to go alongside my existing one.
(Can M.2/NVME drives be RAID-ed for faster access? or not worth the hassle these days?)
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Oct 2009
Posts
13,839
Location
Spalding, Lincs
It is overkill yes, but at that price point it's not such bad value either. Having one big drive vs two or more smaller drives, yes you will lose everything vs only losing half or a third of your data, but really anything you don't want to lose should be backed up in two locations anyway.

Personally I run a NAS with several drives & a parity drive which allows for one drive to fail at a time without any data loss. But that's a whole different rabbit hole :p I think in your case I would go for the single larger drive and have a backup in place.

As for RAID on NVME drives, absolutely no point these days :)
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
Ok great, cheers andy_mk3. I think Ill go with the 12TB Gold and the SN750 2TB.

Incidentally, I have a NAS but its a very bog standard one and must be 10 years old now?

Any recommendation for something not overly complicated for a novice :) ?
(storage wise I would like there to be around 6 to 8TB at least in the NAS.
 
Soldato
Joined
11 Oct 2006
Posts
4,973
Location
Wiltshire
There's not really any difference in complication between NASs. Just buy from one of the three major brands (Asustor, QNAP & Synology) and they'll all be equally easy to set up. The major choice is that of RAID level and that only becomes a real issue with four drives or more. For your use I'd suggest a two-drive unit using RAID1 with HDDs each equal to the total storage you want.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
Soldato
OP
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
Ah fair comment!

On reflection I was thinking about what some of you were mentioning about RAIDing, I guess its always useful to have a back up of the backup....
Anything in the Synology range which would suit this for having 2 drive bays?

(or is it overkill for now?)
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
Ok for a NAS this is ok... but for my rig? It will drive me crazy so I will send back the WD Gold 10TB for sure.

I do want a high performing drive but I am not fussed about Data server/enterprise level.

Something with 7200rpm... any suggestions folks?
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
Sorry for an additional post folks, so I think Ive narrowed it down to :
(10TB drive)

WD Red Pro, Red Plus, Purple Pro, Black
Or the Seagate Ironwold or Skyhawk...

I
am
Confoozed :)

The gold is much too loud as I discovered above, perhaps the Black would be better?
 
Soldato
Joined
11 Oct 2006
Posts
4,973
Location
Wiltshire
The WD Reds and Seagate Ironwolf are intended for NAS use so you can discount those straight away. Similarly, the WD Purple is intended for use in surveillance systems so not appropriate for your use. That just leaves two to choose from.
A small amount of initial research would have shown you the drives' intended use, would have prevented you buying the Gold in the first place and being confused with your later choices.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
8 Dec 2004
Posts
14,948
Location
Hampshire
So returning the Gold 10TB I ordered for my PC (Im keeping the 6GB for my NAS, to be honest Im not too fussed about the sound from it as I back up once a week or so).
Instead I just received my WD Black 10TB...
and have to say... its spot on, I honestly cant hear it over the case fans (which are not that loud anyway).

I also bought another 2TB WD Black M2 drive, so got plenty of storage now :)

Thanks to all for your advice and comments.

Incidentally, what is the defacto HD benchmark software to use to make sure Im getting what Im supposed to be getting out of the drives?
 
Back
Top Bottom