Poll: Brazilian Grand Prix 2021, São Paulo - Race 19

Rate the 2021 Brazilian Grand Prix out of ten


  • Total voters
    168
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
17,919
Location
London
Christians answer in the press conference just prior to announcement:
For a millisecond I almost reconsidered on his point about them racing hard and going in too deep. But then I remember it was clear as day that Lewis was easily going to make the apex had there not been a Red Bull in the way, and he had to make avoiding action from Max gliding out towards the run-off with little attempt to turn in :rolleyes:

It's going to be really tricky for Lewis to get past him now. Go on the inside, he'll turn into you... go on the outside and he'll run you off. Ridiculous.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2010
Posts
5,631
Location
Birmingham
Not about tears but driving standards, they have now set a precedent that you can now push someone full off the track by not taking the corner yourself.

I'm just waiting now for someone else to try it the next race or 3 where they do give a penalty. It's the only thing that can make this decision more farcical.

The only consistent thing about the stewards is they're inconsistent.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2013
Posts
8,570
I feel mixed about this. On one hand I want the drivers to be able to race, however should a car be allowed to intentially not make the corner because they're driving a competitor off of the track? If it took Max to leave the track to defend the position then that isn't on in my book.

I don't think the penalty had to be too harsh, either 5 secs from that race (maybe too harsh as it would drop him a place) or a small grid penalty. A grid penalty would be unlikely to harm him too much but would show that he can't get away with driving how he did.
 
Caporegime
Joined
19 May 2004
Posts
31,537
Location
Nordfriesland, Germany
The stewards are implying that Masi is incompetent then.

Huh? Where are you getting that from?

Max is gonna do that way more often now he knows it's gucci. As will other drivers. F1 is continuing to be a farce and it's entirely the inconsistent stewarding that does it.

Max was doing it already, most of the time he gets away with it. In Silverstone it put him in the wall and the Stewards actually penalised Lewis for it; in Monza he took them both out. Other drivers get penalised or not apparently on the role of a dice. I wouldn't be surprised to see someone given a harsh penalty for some borderline incident this weekend as they inevitably over-correct.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jan 2006
Posts
11,003
Location
All along the watchtower
Huh? Where are you getting that from?



Max was doing it already, most of the time he gets away with it. In Silverstone it put him in the wall and the Stewards actually penalised Lewis for it; in Monza he took them both out. Other drivers get penalised or not apparently on the role of a dice. I wouldn't be surprised to see someone given a harsh penalty for some borderline incident this weekend as they inevitably over-correct.
Because he had all the information needed to make the correct decision.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Feb 2004
Posts
18,158
Location
Hampshire
I feel mixed about this. On one hand I want the drivers to be able to race, however should a car be allowed to intentially not make the corner because they're driving a competitor off of the track? If it took Max to leave the track to defend the position then that isn't on in my book.

I don't think the penalty had to be too harsh, either 5 secs from that race (maybe too harsh as it would drop him a place) or a small grid penalty. A grid penalty would be unlikely to harm him too much but would show that he can't get away with driving how he did.

In an alternate world i'd have liked to have seen if Bottas wasn't 3s behind and was 6s behind if it would have been reviewed and penalty given.

But i think it's good it's not being taken away, post race driving penalties irk me so much.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Apr 2009
Posts
24,855
Because he had all the information needed to make the correct decision.
Masi doesn't make the decision, he refers to the stewards and they decide what to do with it.

He referred it, they decided it didn't warrant investigation and they've now doubled down on that decision that it doesn't warrant investigation.

Not sure what else is expected of Masi beyond referring it, as he did?
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Feb 2015
Posts
12,621
FIA have backed themselves in a corner.

Either they let everyone do it and it becomes like F1 on a computer game.

Or they change their approach then a legal challenge comes in for not applying the rules in this race.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom