Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,546
Dublin treaty says they should seek refuge in 1st safe country not cherry pick.Impossible. Watch this, you might learn something.
If they resort to that you know they have lost the argument.I wondered how long it would be before the racism accusations started getting rolled out
Dublin treaty says they should seek refuge in 1st safe country not cherry pick.
Do people have to claim asylum in the first safe country they reach?
No. Neither the 1951 Refugee Convention, nor EU law requires a person to claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. People trying to cross the Channel can legitimately claim asylum in the UK if they reach it.
The Dublin Regulations is a system which allows one EU country to require another to accept responsibility for a person who has claimed asylum when specific conditions apply, including that the person is shown to have previously made a claim of asylum in another EU country. The intention is that asylum claims are then shared more evenly between EU countries.
The Dublin system only operates within the EU and it will almost certainly cease to apply to the UK following Brexit.
Hasn't that been superceded by Dublin 3?Nope
I wondered how long it would be before the racism accusations started getting rolled out
They’re here for a nice big fat chunk of British taxpayers money. Why live in a country where you have to work to get things in life when you can rock up to the UK and have a good chance of getting the lot handed to you on a plate.
I wondered how long it would be before the racism accusations started getting rolled out
Hasn't that been superceded by Dublin 3?
"The Dublin Regulation (also known as Dublin III) is EU law setting out which country is responsible for looking at an individual’s asylum application. This is usually the country where the asylum seeker first arrives in the EU. The Dublin Regulation applies to EU Member States and Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The UK was bound by the Dublin Regulation until 31 December 2020."
I wondered how long it would be before the racism accusations started getting rolled out
I'm pretty sure the point being made is that ridiculous wastes of taxpayers cash in to useless PPE contracts and track and trace is what you should be concerned about, as opposed to 26,000 people a year getting £37 a week until their asylum claims are dealt with.
Only 1,547 people applied for asylum in Denmark in 2020, a 57 per cent drop on the previous year and the lowest number since the 1990s, but Frederiksen says she wants to reduce the number of asylum applications to zero.
I’m too long in the tooth to get involved in this debate(?), I’ll just say this Rob if asylum seekers were only after a chunk of money they would stop well before the UK. The UK really don’t offer the “fattest chunk of money” to use your words.
People in general should have more empathy for other human beings.
The royal navy should simply push them back.
I'm pretty sure the point being made is that ridiculous wastes of taxpayers cash in to useless PPE contracts and track and trace is what you should be concerned about, as opposed to 26,000 people a year getting £37 a week until their asylum claims are dealt with.
The royal navy should simply push them back.