Agreed. YouTube compression aside, I watched a couple sequences and didn't notice anything. Would be interesting to see whether DLDSR improves the rough edges in FC6 - it's working really well in RDR2.
Yeah I'm really not seeing the issues in that video, certainly nothing like the low ps 2 like textures, which plagued the game and was even shown in ubi official PR/ad footage
Good shout on DLDSR, not sure how well it would work in fc 6 though as the TAA in fc 6 is really bad with regards to motion clarity and blurriness, it's why I avoided using FSR when playing at 3440x1440 as it noticeably increased these taa issues. Suppose DLSSR would help with sharpness overall but then it would hit performance hard. FC 6 is desperately crying out more for dlss/dlaa!
A couple of games sponsored by AMD. Just down to poor cache management rather than lack of VRAM.
Which games those? Pretty sure I debunked them, at least if you're referring to godfall, fc 6 and re village
Ohh dear....
GeForce Now RTX 3080 Cloud Review vs xCloud/Stadia - The Best Streaming Solution?
Even the cloud 3080 known as the A10G has 24GB GDDR6 VRAM...
So does Nvidia think 10GB is really enough, while their 3080 parts for their cloud service have 24GB VRAM ?
ohh yes these need adding ..
One for
@TNA
and
One for
@Nexus18
He shows the issue at the very start of the video and you can clearly see the texture quality dropping as the mouse is moved around throughout the whole video. You don't need to pause it, you can just watch it and see the quality drop in textures all over the screen whenever the mouse is moved. It matches perfectly what he has in the description. It's not my video though so can't say much more than that, but texture quality does not drop like that on the 6900 XT.
Maybe the developer was on to something when they mentioned this in the patch notes.
What I will say is that this discussion is less interesting to me now that the 12GB version is here, since I know the 6700 XT 12GB could run this game just fine without the texture dropping issue or the separate FPS dropping issue - which was tied to vram saturation at 4K max settings. FPS were well below 60, but there was no visual texture degradation or FPS drop to single digits, other than low FPS and the feeling of FPS being below 60.
Someone asked for links, only the reason i re-entered the thread to be honest.
I'm still not seeing it??? Other than the LOD loading in as you get closer to said objects/areas or if you were to quickly spin around, it looks to be working much the same as any gpu out there with more vram
e.g. @28.57, you can see the game world load in more higher res. textures and detail as he move closer to said objects/area especially with the roads (although I believe that was/is an issue with anisotropic filtering for road assets)
And as mentioned at the top of my post, it could be down to TAA i.e. see this example from halo infinite:
https://www.reddit.com/r/FuckTAA/comments/rf7mkn/heres_an_excellent_example_of_the_horrendus_taa/
Also, where are the guys settings too? Has he got things like CAS, motion blur, CA etc. turned on
People get very tribal over this subject (as can be seen by the emotion on display throughout the discussion). We don't need to get specific, but we all know who they are.
My opinion has never changed. The 3080 was and is still a great card, at a great price point. I'd have got one if they were easily available at RRP. I had a few
things I'd have liked to test in a controlled environment. Then I'd have sold it on (at cost) to a needy gamer on the MM, just as i did with a 6800 XT and some 6900 XTs to other respected members here.
Is it enough to run everything maxed out without issue some issues like the ones already documented? No. Is it enough for most things, yes it is. I think most of the sane people in the thread would agree with that. Will that change in the future, perhaps lets wait and see. I'm sure the next game/debate is just around the corner.
Not sure why you keep saying about people getting emotionally or personally involved etc., it's about facts and evidence, nothing else, one side posts plenty of evidence to back up their points, meanwhile the other doesn't or/and grasps at straws (if you can even call it that...) and plenty of people are starting to notice the lack of any real substance/content behind such claims.
Also, who has said this "run everything maxed out without issue some issues like the ones already documented"? I don't think anyone has, now to be more specific, the claims being made are:
- no settings have had to be turned down because of vram "only" issues
Where as:
- settings have had to be turned down because of the lack of "grunt", same way even 3090/6900xt have had to turn down settings because all that extra vram didn't provide the grunt required
. If they are releasing 12GB variants this late in their product cycle I have to wonder what the vram will be for the 40 series? Will they limit the 4080 to just 12GB for example? Time will tell.
