Scan of Todays Sun - Friendly Fire Incident

Man of Honour
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
9,851
Location
Abilene, Texas
Shackley said:
a) they aren't professionals, they are amateur weekend warriors
b) it will do a whole lot of good if the US military learn to look before they shoot in future

Incidentally, there has been next to no mention of the report that two Iraqi civilians who had been waving a large white flag were also killed in this contact - I guess that they don't matter - I wonder how many other Iraqi civilians, waving large white flags were also murdered by US cowboys without comment in the western media or courts?

Weekend warriors? How do you know they werent active duty?
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Dec 2003
Posts
6,204
Location
Gone......
Shackley said:
a) they aren't professionals, they are amateur weekend warriors
b) it will do a whole lot of good if the US military learn to look before they shoot in future

Incidentally, there has been next to no mention of the report that two Iraqi civilians who had been waving a large white flag were also killed in this contact - I guess that they don't matter - I wonder how many other Iraqi civilians, waving large white flags were also murdered by US cowboys without comment in the western media or courts?


There are times where I wish I could just scream. Reserve units have the IDENTICAL training that active duty units do. What you are probably confusing them with are National Guard units. So, just on that basis alone, both you and dirtydog can take your uneducated (on this subject) opinions (that's what you've been spouting, because you have NO clue of the facts) and shove them up your collective arses.

If you go through the transcript of the cockpit conversations you'll realise that the pilots were given the all clear from thier air traffic controller (Manilla Hotel) working along side UK ATC's. So just on that bit of info right there, it looks like the buck stops right at your own doorstop.

SO for all you America bashing "cowboys" that think you're all so high and mighty, think about that. It was your own personel that created the whole incident to begin with.
 
Man of Honour
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
9,851
Location
Abilene, Texas
andy said:
the pilots said they could see the orange marks so why did they even ask permission to shoot :S


They saw the orange tarps but were unsure of what the vehicles were. They radioed in to ask if their were any friendly units in the area and were told there were none. Thats when they decided that they were enemy.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Dec 2003
Posts
6,204
Location
Gone......
andy said:
the pilots said they could see the orange marks so why did they even ask permission to shoot :S


From the link I posted....

cockpit transcript said:
1351.30 POPOV35:

They did say there were no friendlies.

1351.33 POPOV36:

Yeah, I know that thing with the orange panels is going to screw us. They look like orange rockets on top.
 
Suspended
OP
Joined
12 Aug 2006
Posts
1,373
Location
CandyMountain
Stiff_Cookie said:
HOLY REPEAT THREAD BATMAN!!!

This topic has ben discussed in another thread. Why doesnt everyone look there? Heck, most peoples areguemnts for or against can be found in that thread, and probably 99.9% of the people on this forums do not have the knowledge of either US or military training or procedures to make comments on the professionalism of either force. What they do know is what the media tells them.

EDIT: as for the pilots not showing remorse. well one said he was gonna be sick and one (maybe the same one) was heard weeping.

I think you'll find I was asking for something in particular - the scan for a presentation I was doing.
The conversation just mutated. That happens.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Dec 2003
Posts
6,204
Location
Gone......
Oh, and how hard is it to take one of these

t-55.jpg


add a little from one of these

opaint.jpg


And come up with something the coalition fighters won't shoot at?


Anyways, I'm out of here. I've had enough of this crap to last me a lifetime. Have fun with your forums.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
19 Jun 2004
Posts
19,437
Location
On the Amiga500
People here (and the general public for that fact) are voicing their opinions on a situation where I can definitely say 99.9% of them have absolutely no experience or understanding of. It's easy for us to criticise the sortie, because we don't fully understand it. None of us can honestly say how we would have acted in that same situation and claim we would not have resulted in allied deaths.

The pilot's mission is to protect the area, if that means there are hostiles in the area then that means take them out. At the time it was considered war, "permission" isn't required I'm sure. As posted many times already, the pilots asked if there were any friendlies in the area and they were told not. I see no problem, it was a genuine mistake...

Shackley said:
a) they aren't professionals, they are amateur weekend warriors....
US cowboys....

They are trained pilots FFS! ...Amateur weekend warriors? What does that make you then?
 
Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
47,396
Location
Essex
Mickey_D said:
There are times where I wish I could just scream. Reserve units have the IDENTICAL training that active duty units do. What you are probably confusing them with are National Guard units. So, just on that basis alone, both you and dirtydog can take your uneducated (on this subject) opinions (that's what you've been spouting, because you have NO clue of the facts) and shove them up your collective arses.
:eek:
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2004
Posts
3,435
Location
Norfolk Broads
Having seen the video I feel sorry for both the chap who died and those who were injured as well as the pilots themselves. It seems quite clear to me that it was not intentional on the pilots behalf.

Did they break the rules? I'll hold my hand up and admit that I haven't a clue as I don't really understand all of the chatter except for the general jist of it, I'm certainly no expert on the rules of engagement either.

Not quite sure either why the tape was classified either, maybe there was a good reason, maybe there wasn't, but I agree that it should have been released to the coroner when he asked for it (albeit 'in camera') and that it has caused unnecessary strife between two allies that has resulted in a diplomatic fubar.

Should they be punished? If it serves as a deterrent and ensures greater safety is taken on the pilots part in the future, and they broke the rules, then yes. It would be no different in civil society. If on the other hand it was one of those accidents that happen in the fog of war, then the best step forward would be an enquiry whose purpose was to determine exactly what went wrong and more importantly, how to prevent a re-occurence.

As with all tabloids, the language they use is designed to tell you what conclusion to draw, it happens with broadsheets as well though, they just use bigger words.
 
Soldato
Joined
31 Mar 2006
Posts
6,605
Location
Sydney Australia
Gotta feel for the family of the British soldier but you also have to feel for the pilots, they sounded totally destroyed in the footage.

We can argue till the cows come home about the US being gun ho and irresponsible but in the end it's still a couple of guys who have just realised that they killed a friendly and are totally destroyed over it.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jan 2004
Posts
3,489
Location
At Home
And its a war zone - where mistakes happen the same as in any other workplace - only difference is, the employees have a lot more chance of dying.


Only way to really prevent this from happening is not being there in the first place (but that will never happen). Friendly fire will always happen. The more people you have there - statistically, the more mistakes will be made.

As was said - they can learn a lot from this video, and will probably use it for years to come in their training courses. It won't bring anyone back, but it may make them think before they take someones life.
 
Suspended
Joined
4 Aug 2003
Posts
3,054
Here is the Sun article giving more details of this attack and suggesting that the MoD considered the US Pilots to be to blame.

Incidentally, Colonel Gus “Skeeter” Kohntopp who killed Matty Hull was a "Reservist" on his first ever active mission and also happens to be a "keen hunter and regular in local game-hunting competitions" - ironic huh?

British psychologists noted that Kohntopp showed a "single-minded pursuit of the UK vehicles".
 
Associate
Joined
19 Nov 2003
Posts
984
Some unbelievable posts have spilled out into this thread!! :eek: :mad:

First (as has already been said) do any of you seriously think that this video was 'leaked' by some high minded junior and brought to air by the courage and tenacity of a reporter at the Sun?? It was released as a 'leak' to avoid complications and I have no doubt that the 'leak' was approved by senior officials (although political pressure or public opinion may have forced their hand).

Second, what is it with people these days that is so outrageously judgemental. The death of Lance Corporal Matty Hull and the others involved is terrible, but to read that some of you think that the pilots should go to jail for this is beyond belief. They were doing their jobs. They might have done them badly (open to debate) but they were only doing their jobs.

If I do my job badly then I don't get paid and I am not asked to do such a job again. If most of you do your jobs badly then you get fired. Why is it that these guys are measured by a different standard? Whatever went wrong, these guys clearly had no intention of killing British soldiers. To send them to jail for it is twisted.

It really annoys me these days that people seem to get severely punished for mistakes or lapses in judgement but those who willingly and knowingly commit crimes are told that they need therapy or rehabilitation. Rubbish, rubbish, rubbish. :mad: :mad:

Well done to our lads for holding the line and being prepared to fight out there. Well done to American pilots for being prepared to get in the cockpit despite all this kind of nonsense. Shame on those who think otherwise.
 
Suspended
Joined
3 Mar 2003
Posts
5,001
Location
London ;()!
Humpty said:
Some unbelievable posts have spilled out into this thread!! :eek: :mad:

First (as has already been said) do any of you seriously think that this video was 'leaked' by some high minded junior and brought to air by the courage and tenacity of a reporter at the Sun?? It was released as a 'leak' to avoid complications and I have no doubt that the 'leak' was approved by senior officials (although political pressure or public opinion may have forced their hand).

Second, what is it with people these days that is so outrageously judgemental. The death of Lance Corporal Matty Hull and the others involved is terrible, but to read that some of you think that the pilots should go to jail for this is beyond belief. They were doing their jobs. They might have done them badly (open to debate) but they were only doing their jobs.

Agreed :(
 
Back
Top Bottom