Search results

I’m quite surprised by that penalty. Potentially dangerous driving is a drive though/20 sec penalty. But actual dangerous driving (F3) is a 3 place grid drop, the same as given for impeding in qualifying. I suppose at this point the inconsistency shouldn’t come as a surprise these days.

Your not? Well I look forward to the copies or links to all the evidence of this other than Red Bull press release saying they did. Again, I think they did investigate but dismissing all information without evidence while stating Red Bull’s investigation as fact also without any evidence is...

But we don’t do we? Red Bull have released a statement saying what they’ve done but we have no evidence they’ve actually done what they’ve claimed. I don’t think Red Bull lied as I do think they investigated as claimed. But to take Red Bull statement as gospel and everything else as fake...

A heads up, AMS2 and DLC is currently discounted if people are missing any of them.

Don't put yourself down mate, my optimum doing time trial is a 1:10.8 but stringing it together is beyond me and realistically low 1:11's is my limit. And on top of that you seem consistent at that pace too so there's very little between us and it should make an entertaining race :)

I think the percentages need to be revisited. Yes, the lower a team finishes in the WCC the more they can develop but it doesn’t seem enough for anyone to actually catch up. Not that I’ve ever agreed with the cap, it’s just a longer term success ballast.

Perez does have a gimped car! But that’s just down to Perez still being the one driving it.

That’s assuming Ford are still in. Pinch to mountain of salt required but there’s rumours Ford are still looking at ways they can back out of the deal. It wouldn’t surprise me if that’s true though even if only for contingency reasons.

:confused: You did. You also quoted a post on an internet forum referencing and talking about an online article about F1 and Mohammed Ben Sulayen’s alleged interference in F1. So F1? check. Social media? check. But your post shouldn’t be taken in the context of the post you quoted as it is...

I’m not sure what you’re suggesting here? That the president of the governing body shouldn’t be investigated if they’re suspected of wrong doing? or just that the media shouldn’t report on the investigation?

Oh to live in such a simple black and white world where you're on Team Red Bull unless you have any sort of questions of doubt which instantly means you're on Team Hater. I bet you and Scam would get on brilliantly if you weren't on opposite sides.

What contradiction? I’ve not said the leaks are real or even that I think they’re real. All I’ve done is acknowledge they exist. Do they cast doubt on the investigation and so the Barristers independence? Yes. Should they? That’s a much harder question to answer and does depend in the...

I didn't mention the governing bodies of F1 so why bring them up :confused: But I guess, while it was an internal investigation, they wouldn't care as it's nothing to do with them. There's a chance they might now with the leak due to the attention it's bringing to F1 as a whole but I'd imagine...

If there’s nothing in his contract about dating subordinates then most of the leak suggest it was consensual so what would they fire him for? Now it’s all been leaked maybe for bringing the company in to disrepute. Which is maybe what’s hoped for given the rumours of power struggles within...

That is a good point.

There is validity in questioning the actual independence of someone appointed by Red Bull to investigate Red Bull. I know it’s the Red Bull parent company investigating Red Bull F1 but I doubt they want the negative press and embarrassment on a subsidiary. It’s a similar discussion about Trump...

Stubby cooler?

Did you break down and being towed round or something Shi? :D

Ferrari did look much better on their long run so they're probably second behind Red Bull. Behind the top group, probably Torro Rosso (Visa Cash Grab or whatever they're actually called)

So nothing but a troll then, cool. And I definitely cast no assertions or assumptions of your character and personality based on the forum username you have chosen for yourself. Is that better @ci_newman?