Search results

to be fair, windows has always been one of the best compnaies for supporting their very old out dated products, not many companies would support 3-4 generations old products

i have no idea what that bogey looking thing is but it certainly looks like you have fried some of the MB

i'm not getting to hyped until it's in the consumers hands to test, i remember how disappointing bulldozer turned out to be

hi guys, long time no post, i recently got a 6700k and have it running stable at 4.4ghz with 1.212v under load atm, i'll go higher clocks when i get time i came from a 2500k and it took me ages of reading and testing to work out why the hell my voltages were all over the place under load when...

yes it's a pile of crap the wireless has never worked on mine and virgin never sent out an engineer like they said they would i have tonight just ordered bt infinity had enough of virgin

ok mr smartass what do you think it means then? skyrim and bf3 don't act like this

bf3 on ps3 is turd unless they fix the input lag and screwed up acceleration on the controls i'm done with bf on console

my sli 560ti play bf3 with quite a bit over 60fps with ease on high the 1gb vram is enough for high but ultra can use more

hmmm mine doesn't make that noise, only a normal buzz

the pump must run at 100% i have the same cooler, i have the pump connected directly to the psu and have 2 fans connected to the cpu headers on the board (cpu and cpu opt) so the pump is 100% all the time and the fans can have profiles grinding noise? all pumps have a buzzing sound if thats...

hwmonitor is my program of choice

are they any good?

not all chips oc the same, some are better than others, depends how lucky you are with the chip you get, i can get 4.5 on 1.328v stable, i tried for 5ghz but it wouldn't boot with volts i was comfortable with, i could boot with 4.9 ant 1.4v but it was not at all stable 58c is fine, some say try...

yes the motherboard will auto guess your volts and you use the offset to manually bring it down (-) or up(+) here's my settings on an asus p8z68-v i think my offset is set to - 0.030 with llc set to high

i happily try them in my case now i have 2 blue 120mm front intake 2 blue fans on my antec 620 and 2 roof exhaust fans, all blue fans

have a p8z68-v, antec 620 with 2 wingboost fans pulling air in from the outside so i get good temps i have only overclocked the turbo multiplier, stable at 4.5ghz for a few months now, just wondering about the cpu vs turbo ratio and what differences there might be concerning volts etc

just wondering how much difference it makes, i have always used the turbo multiplier but a couple of ppl have said they got lower volts by disabling the turbo and just over clocking the cpu ratio anyone tried doing both and care to share some info?

turning llc down to high intel burn test comes more into line with prime 95 voltage usage still a bit higher though, prime fluctuates between 1.328 - 1.336 intel burn test is 1.336 - 1.344 burn test get them temps a lot hotter it seems, this program seems better than prime to me, it's quicker...

i'm getting 114 gflops at 4.5 122 you say? wonder why mine is a bit lower also is ther a reason i'm getting higher voltage in burn test compared to prime? 1.328 for prime but burn test goes up to 1.352 for some reason