Search results

Again, who decides what is misinformation? Who decides what is nonsense? Who are you giving the power to? Haven't people learned anything from the past two years? A lot of what was considered misinformation in the past is now considered the truth. This is why it's good to hear from different...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DexB97CPHrM&ab_channel=GBNews This reminded me of another time scientists (especially Chris Whitty) and mainstream media were wrong despite everyone knowing the truth about omicron. Chris Whitty "This is a really serious threat at the moment. The how big a...

What platforms? Where do you think I'm getting my information from?

How do you know that? This is just your opinion. I'm sure you wouldn't want to force your opinion onto me and restrict my freedom by not allowing me to see information. That would make you a terrible person.

You're being childish now. We're not saying people should listen to anyone with an opintion. Are you aware that we are capable of deciding for ourselves who we listen to?

Do you not think the mainstream have conflict of interests? How do you decide who to trust? Who decides this? Who is given that power? You're being silly at the end. You are welcome to listen to whoever you want, but don't expect that everyone else has to listen to only who you want us to...

How do you decide what are false claims? We've already shown how things that were considered to be false claims turned out to be true. How do you decide what expert is correct? If experts disagree, which happens all the time, how do you decide who the expert is right? How do you decide who...

How many have you listened to in full? He has a high quality of guests on there. Which brings me to, This is an important point. Perr reviewed doesn't mean it's correct. Screeeech seems to believe that we know who can be trusted, and people. Who's right and who is wrong. What's fact and...

Hear him out and have a conversation. I would want to hear his reasons for what he thinks. Why would I care if an expert said something that went against current mainstream advice? We all know that current advice isn't always right. We've seen that and many have given examples in this thread.

Who decides what is dangerous, inaccurate and misleading nonsense?

I know what it means. I'm saying there wasn't a general agreement. Not in the scientific community. The mainstream was consistently wrong and not because we didn't know enough at the time.

This is not true. What are you basing this on? There were a lot of experts going against the mainstream opinion and they turned out to be right. There were a lot of people saying it was likely to have come from the lab while the mainstream said it didn't. It's likely for political reasons why...

So you do think for yourself. You were able to do your own research and decide who you thought you should listen to. You did have the intelligence to make up your own mind. This is what I'm saying people should be allowed to do instead of having people decide what information they're allowed to...

Doctors don't always agree though. Who did you listen to during the pandemic? How did you decide who was the right people to listen to? What do you do when you heard different opinions from different doctors/experts? You must have thought for yourself at some point during all this.

No that's not the argument. The point is that what is considered misinformation changes so clamping down on free speech because you think something is misinformation isn't a good idea. We have given you examples of things that were widely considered misinformation but are not now. If you had...

I'm a busy man. I have my own business, hobbies, family etc. I don't spend a lot of time on the internet. This was an hour and a half after you asked the question. Were you sitting by your computer checking to see if you had a reply? All this. Facebook was even banning people from posting that...

Again, who decides what is misinformation? As I mentioned before, a lot of things that were considered misinformation during this pandemic are now considered facts. So who has the power to decide what are facts and what is misinformation?

It's a silly article. Beth is isn't someone who should be claiming other people are spreading misinformation. She's at fault when it comes to that herself.

You have to keep Roar87's scomment in context. Keep in mind chroniclard replied to this, with this. It looks like he didn't agree with letting people say what they want and debating as we need to care for the vulnerable. That's chroniclard trying to use it to curb free speech.

Who decides what is misinformation? Over the past two years, there have been many things that were considered misinformation and only conspiracy loons would think were true and are now considered facts. There are often disagreements within the scientific community and governments and mainstream...