Search results

AW3821DW's panel is 37.5" 3840*1600 (12:5).

@Enzarch, that was a good short report. Pleased to hear that your efforts paid off. Congrats on the third attempt.

Correct display resolution: 3440x1440

d

I hope DP 2.0 will finally come to fruition in this monitor, as well. But it would just be DSC, probably. Or, maybe, Samsung engineers found a way to implement adaptive sync through a couple of DP 1.4 ports.

38GL950G already has G-Sync. Do you mean that 38GN950 will also have G-Sync module, but with VRR and Adaptive-Sync support? And the preliminary data says that it will have 160 Hz max refresh rate (native). But I could be wrong interpreting info from LG's press release.

What do we know about 38GN950 at the moment?

So, if the info regarding 38WN95C is correct, LG is capping it (max refresh rate = 144 Hz) to restrain the competition with 38GL950G instead of just making the best product they can and competing with other companies on the market. There is some logic in that, I think.

How is 160 Hz 8 bpc mode working for you? Are there any new observations?

Why would you possibly want that if there is cheaper G-Sync compatible LG C9 with HDMI 2.1 and some HDR capabilities as well?

175 hz refresh rate capability doesn't take anything away from this monitor (as well as completely unusable 'faster' response time mode). But, it is a mystery for me, why the most of the monitors only have standard maximum refresh rate tier like 144 hz and the OC tier (175 hz for this model)...

What would qualify info as solid in this particular case?

Yes, I beleive so. The certain North American shop expects its availability on Oct 29, 2019. And RTINGS.com reside in North America.

They have still got 19 days left to choose the monitor for a review. By that time it will be released, I believe.

Did anybody vote for 38GL950G review yet? https://www.rtings.com/monitor/suggestions

https://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-38GL950G-B-gaming-monitor

Congrats! May I suggest you to do a video review since you're so enthusiastic about both CRG9 and C9?

Running 5120x1440 resolution at 120 Hz with 10 bpc (without compression, CVT-R2) requires 28.55 Gbit/s bandwidth. And DP 1.4 can only provide 25.92 Gbit/s.

Does anybody know if this monitor can pass DisplayHDR CTS 1.1 tests for 1000 tier?

The specs (on asus.com) say 48-120 Hz VRR for game developement (the next gen gaming consoles, presumably). So, it will, probably, be one of the first PC monitors with HDMI 2.1 ports.