Search results

No proof for density improvements 4N vs 4NP. Yes, B100 has around 123MTr/mm2 vs 98MTr/mm2 GH100 but AD102 has 125MTr/mm2. Could be just B100 being more dense packed and GB202 will be at best 130MTr/mm2. So GB202 will need to be 800mm2+~ for 192SM 128MB L2 512bit. Turing vs Pascal all over again.

Voices in my head told me this.

If top dog from RDNA4 lineup can't beat 7900XTX then 5090 will get GB203 with 256bit bus and 32Gb/s 3GB Micron GDDR7. My wild prediction GB202 216SM 384bit 1536GB/s Quadro Blackwell 72GB 212SM Titan Blackwell 36GB 192SM GB203 128SM 256bit 1024GB/s (5090 24GB) Bonus

Who is Nvidia fan? :D I just posted the hybrid raster + RT from 3Dmark showing that if Navi31 will have 3X the perf of 6900XT in RT + Raster then RTX 4090 will cooked. 2X pure raster over 6900XT = Nvidia cooked in raster 3X in RT + Raster = Nvidia cooked everywhere.

Fastest 6900XT vs Fastest RTX 4090 That's raster + RT benchmark Navi31 with 12288 shaders and 3ghz+ clocks should be 2x faster in raster and 2,5-3X in hybrid RT+Raster imho.

RTX 4090 is like 5X faster in synthetic 3Dmark DXR feature test. But in the newest more real world 3Dmark Speedway just only 3x~

Speculation

Navi33 with 203mm2 die on 6nm matching the 6900XT or close to it? 8GB vs 16GB 128bit vs 256bit 203mm2 vs 520mm2 Delusions

13600KF 14c/20t 294$ vs 7600X 6c/12t 300$ 13700K 410$ 16c/24t vs 7700X 8c/16t 400$ :D

So you are saying ... Jensen is disappointed in you.

12600K 5,1ghzP 4ghzE vs 7700X

This is why you get 192bit bus instead of 256bit and 300mm2~ TSMC 5nm instead of 400mm2 Samsung 8nm. Going by die size and bus width the true succesor to 500$ RTX 3070 will be RTX 4080 700-800$ MSRP

It's a stock CPU with out of the box settings, so yes, you can tune better.

13900K is holding 5,2ghzP 4-4,1ghz E at stock with 253W PL2