Search results

if your goal is to upgrade the reference cards, you get it, but for the most beautiful custom or liquid versions, months have passed since launch. For example, I never upgrade at launch, I let months pass so that all the custom and particular models come out to have more choice.

but it is never 2 years if the goal, after 1 year the refreshes on the same generation come out, see nvidia that comes out with 3000, then in the middle it comes out with 3000ti and so on

these are the same speeches that are repeated cyclically with each generational leap, whoever buys the new amd "7900" will find himself having to deal with the 8900 'models that will come in the next generation, it is a dog that bites its tail. In this hobby, if you want to have the top of the...

it may be that the situation will improve in 2023 but we do not know, in May of next year there could be changes on ethereum but even this we do not know for sure. The point is that the top of the range, both on the cpu and on the gpu, has always been and always will be the band that suffers...

it has always been like this with the top of the range, even those who buy the new cards that will be released in 2022 will find themselves in 2023 with other updated models. If you think like this you don't buy anything.

I believe you, if it does not trigger background noise on the headphones it is not a problem, there are some cards that generate a coil whine that goes through the power supply and goes to generate a noise on the speakers, , a kind of hum that increases as the load on the gpu increases, but I...

noise not a big problem for me if it comes from the case, it becomes a problem if you trigger the noise through your speakers or headphones

I'm evaluating between the aorus and the powercolor liquid devil ultimate, on the devil almost all the owners complain about the coil whine, this is also a bit annoying, I don't understand if it is a general problem of all 6900s or if only of this model ?

thank you. how's the card apart from that, does it have a good overclock?

I am about to buy the same gpu, I would be curious to know if you have solved it, your situation has put me some doubts about the purchase

in the case of titles that do not remain stable above 50 fps, it is sufficient to simply create a custom resolution at 3440x1440 to gain about 30 fps, obviously not in full screen but by removing the proportioning, a sort of 34 within the 38. I am doing it very often, not for a problem of...

at the moment I have both monitors (34 and 38GN), the first with hdr400 and the second with hdr 600: both are far from being judged as hdr ready, hdr 1000 is something else. finally, the local diming function introduced on 38 is only useful for marketing purposes, in real use a local dimming...

The GL model no longer has any sense of existing and being bought since GN came out, it is very likely that the GL will go out of production shortly. There is no perceptible difference between compatible gsync (nvidia certified) and gsync with module in these models. Specific in these models...

yes it is, but not even in 21/9 (if of adequate size) you have to turn your head, the advantage of 21/9 is that you have more horizontal fov, you see enemies on your sides that you would not see on 16/9, this is huge advantage. To have the same fov as a 21/9 on a 16/9, you have to raise it at...

yes, 25 or 27 16/9 but this only because in live lan competitions there is that type of screens, in reality 21/9 is the best choice for fps. Obviously for this use the 21/9 must have a manageable size and resolution, 34 is the sweetspot.

Excellent both. The 38 has a slightly higher maximum bright than the 34 but still not enough to make a good HDR. The 38 has local dimming (absent in 34) but the areas are few, useless feature. The 38 has a sphere 2.0 light effect (absent in 34), this is also a nice but useless feature in my...

Iso 400

38 at home, no blb, very little glow only on the left corner, no vignette, no pixel death, very lucky. these days I have made 34GN comparisons against 38GN. it's a long story ......

here we are, finally, so we take away from this false idea that gsync module is better than compatible gsync, it does NOT change anything. Really reading about people still looking for 38GL is absurd, it does not make sense that monitor today with GN available I read about your vignette...

I confirm, indeed, if I have to be honest I see more fluidity in the 34GN (compatible gsync) than in the 34GK950G (gsync module), also I do not see any overshoot around the minimum fps that I do (100-120fps), both with overdrive on fast or normal. Not what to say for different experiences, each...