Fukushima

Seismicity standards rate the building at a zero, meaning even a small earthquake could send it into a heap of rubble.
Click to expand...

There has been small earth quakes since so I reckon this is just mumbo jumbo. Also it could be legitimate though.
 
I got to the point where he says a small earthquake would result in "catastrophic radiological fire that could wipe out most of the northern hemisphere" and stopped reading...

Can't see it being anything balanced judging from that. Going to be nuclear hate by someone who doesn't actually know anything.
 
scaremongering to help sell his snake oil.

http://blog.imva.info/

just to give you a sense of the "reliability" of this Doctor


I hold the honorary title of doctor of Oriental medicine
Click to expand...

Certainly seems a man to trust on the subject of nuclear power.


Special Note: These subjects are covered in my Nuclear Toxicity Syndrome book as well as the second edition of my Iodine book (both published in 2011), which dive deeply into the issue and threat of radioactive iodine.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
desires said:
There has been small earth quakes since so I reckon this is just mumbo jumbo. Also it could be legitimate though.
Click to expand...

Small?

I'm sure many of the aftershocks were about 6+... Probably enough to flatten a lot of streets in the UK.:D


If it smells like ****, looks like **** and in this case reads like **** then it almost certainly is ****...
 
The nuclear physicists I follow on Twitter reckon that everything will be OK. Background radiation levels 1000ft from the plant are lower than those found in Cornwall.
 
Tunney said:
The nuclear physicists I follow on Twitter reckon that everything will be OK. Background radiation levels 1000ft from the plant are lower than those found in Cornwall.
Click to expand...

Doesn't Cornwall have problems with radon gas which actually does raise deaths in the region by quite a bit?
So for all those Cornwall overclockers, radon is not nice :(.
 
The whole Fukushima thing was such a shame.

Here is a nuclear powerplant which was hit by both an Earthquake AND a Tsunami and STILL didnt kill anyone from the resulting nuclear meltdown yet it seems to have been siezed upon as an excuse to abandon nuclear power?

How many people were killed mining coal over the last year?
 
[TW]Fox;22222667 said:
Here is a nuclear powerplant which was hit by both an Earthquake AND a Tsunami and STILL didnt kill anyone from the resulting nuclear meltdown yet it seems to have been siezed upon as an excuse to abandon nuclear power?
Click to expand...
The accident will kill hundreds if not thousands of people indirectly (by causing illness).
 
Hatter The Mad said:
The accident will kill hundreds if not thousands of people indirectly (by causing illness).
Click to expand...

Why do you say that?
It doesn't look like it will kill anyone from the reports out there. You can't compare it to any previous nuclear disaster, massive safety precautions were taken that limited exposure to workers and the locals didn't get much dosage.
 
Antar Bolaeisk said:
More importantly, how many giant mutant creatures and superheroes/villains has nuclear power created? Reason enough to continue with it until we get results :p

There should be a death/Watt comparison made between the different forms of energy generation.
Click to expand...

There is, and nuclear is pretty much the lowest, one second I will try and find the image.
vxqfb.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom