• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

R9 Nano Review thread

Caporegime
OP
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,322
Location
Essex innit!
So we again start to stress the PC in a similar fashion, this round the card seated in a closed and mediocre cooled mITX/Micro ATX chassis. BTW to get an idea of how small it really is, that chassis measures (WxHxD) 16 x 42 x 46cm.

As you can see, the card is now running hotter and passes the 75 Degrees thermal limiter that AMD has set. The fan now cranks up making more noise to compensate, but the temps are kept steady at a maximum of 77~78 Degrees C, which is still OK. At that temperature we see the thermal throttling a little more active as it now hovers in the 850 to 880 MHz range.

Result: 78 Degrees C - Throttling base clock at 850~880 MHz.
Honestly, not bad at all. However, the downside in a closed small chassis with average airflow is that the noise level increases whereas in a properly cooled airflow environment this card was totally silent.
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Nov 2011
Posts
11,376
I'm struggling to see why you wouldnt just get a 390 of some description as they are so close in most of these benches, as they will both throttle in a small case anyway, its nearly double the price for single digit differences, and in the SFF case the reference 980ti is still loads faster so quite what is the advantage of getting the Nano?
 
Back
Top Bottom