£125k payout over "Black Jelly Babies"

Status
Not open for further replies.
i hate WHITE paper... what does it say? that white people are thin and flimsy?!

demand recompense!!!!!!!

edit; infact i saw some guy scribbling all over the paper and then screw it up and throw it in the bin.

perhaps thats an indication of what they want to do with white people.
 
Last edited:
When you consider the article, note how the Mail has not actually mentioned that there was a racial aspect to the person's unfair dismissal claim, but by mentioning the racial harrasment trial (and associated statement read out by the Defendant in court) in the same article as the settlement with London Underground, one is led to assume that a racial aspect formed a part of the employment claim.

Also of interest is the statement made by one of the Defendant's lawyers when the racial harassment case had just concluded:

Mr Cooney, from Southgate, north London, said he had previously offered Mr Jean Marie a bag of Jelly Babies, only to be accused of being racist because there were too many black ones.

However, the indictment did not relate to this particular occasion, Mr Cooney's solicitor Sean Gallagher said.
Click to expand...
More quality reporting from the Mail it is then :cool:
 
Last edited:
I cannot understand how anyone with an ounce of intelligence would read such an awful paper.
I'd rather read The Sun then the Mail and that’s saying something :p At least their not slimy and sneaky like the Daily Mail is.

When theirs such a good selection of papers (Times, Independent, Guardian, Telegraph ..etc) I really cannot understand how the Mail has not gone out of business :confused: I guess theirs a lot more racist and ignorant people in the U.K then I first thought :(
 
M0t0r0la said:
I cannot understand how anyone with an ounce of intelligence would read such an awful paper.
I'd rather read The Sun then the Mail and that’s saying something :p At least their not slimy and sneaky like the Daily Mail is.

When theirs such a good selection of papers (Times, Independent, Guardian, Telegraph ..etc) I really cannot understand how the Mail has not gone out of business :confused: I guess theirs a lot more racist and ignorant people in the U.K then I first thought :(
Click to expand...

the times f.t.w tbqfh ^^
 
Mr Nice said:
I mean, really. Why are people so sensitive.....
Click to expand...
Because they can get special treatment and fat handouts?
I like black jelly babies best, they taste the nicest. I also like ribena made from blackcurrants and I like blackberries. I wonder how much that would cost me if I worked for London Underground.
 
Clinkz said:
We must act now to remove ALL black jelly babies from our streets. Think of the children.

An on-line petition is clearly in order.
Click to expand...

Hmm who used to post things like this all the time (word for word pretty much), claims to have a new OCUK account and is a general muppet?
 
VIRII said:
Because they can get special treatment and fat handouts?
I like black jelly babies best, they taste the nicest. I also like ribena made from blackcurrants and I like blackberries. I wonder how much that would cost me if I worked for London Underground.
Click to expand...

well, it's against the law for white people to sue in racial incidents so...
 
M0t0r0la said:
No doubt the pathetic excuse for a paper 'Daily Mail' have just picked up on just this one point of the case to bolster their racist anti-immigration views.
The victim probably endured weeks/months of systematic racial abuse, otherwise I find it very hard to believe that they would settle out of court for such a large amount of money.
Click to expand...

Bahahahahahahhahaahahahahahahhaha.

Being anti immigration is not racist :rolleyes:

Out of court settlements can often be far cheaper and cleaner than going to court. Do you have ANY evidence whatsoever for your claim that he *probably* endured weeks of abuse...... and you call the daily mail sensationalist .... Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaah.
 
VIRII said:
Hmm who used to post things like this all the time (word for word pretty much), claims to have a new OCUK account and is a general muppet?
Click to expand...


:p Doubt it's Shackley, isn't it his "mate" Alan celebrating 100 days in captivity?

He's probably lighting a candle and quietly weeping....
 
M0t0r0la said:
When theirs such a good selection of papers (Times, Independent, Guardian, Telegraph ..etc) I really cannot understand how the Mail has not gone out of business :confused: I guess theirs a lot more racist and ignorant people in the U.K then I first thought :(
Click to expand...
Whatever you read just make sure it has decent spelling and grammar and that it understands the meaning of "theirs".
 
Mr Nice said:
:p Doubt it's Shackley, isn't it his "mate" Alan celebrating 100 days in captivity?

He's probably lighting a candle and quietly weeping....
Click to expand...
Shackley got banned? When and why? Why wasn't I invited to his send off grrrr.
 
cleanbluesky said:
The article doesn't state what the employment tribunal was about, how do you know it is not to do with the racism allegations?
Click to expand...
It seems he was dismissed for some reason, tried to claim it was unfair dismissal on racial grounds and then went for racial harrasment against 2 co-workers.
I wonder if he was really just rubbish at his job and really hard to work with because of his gigantic chip on his shoulder?
 
Nickg said:
but you could have "racist, anti immigration views" however...
Click to expand...
You might have, however if you are racist how likely are you to be pro immigration? So your anti immigration views would simply be a part of your racist views. However to be against immigration on economic and social grounds is not racist. Something the ignorant mail hating bigots struggle to comprehend poor lambs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom