Oh yes.... and don't think AMD can't or wont, Zen in on a 3Ghz process and the 1800X runs at 3.7Ghz base.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
1800X to 7700K ?
- Thread starter Dicehunter
- Start date
Oh yes.... and don't think AMD can't or wont, Zen in on a 3Ghz process and the 1800X runs at 3.7Ghz base.
3.7Ghz base with Intel 14nm Quadcore efficiency. It's going to be exciting going forward, that's for sure.Oh yes.... and don't think AMD can't or wont, Zen in on a 3Ghz process and the 1800X runs at 3.7Ghz base.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23,552
- Location
- Hertfordshire
Zen 2 hype train! On board!
hes on matts trail...
yes i seen that.still doesnt show what is the actual truth but im sure you will see some more of the proper benchmarks soon on whats the best for gaming
So because it doesn't show what you want to see it isn't the actual truth?
Are all 27k of your posts like this?
Someone is closing eyes, covering ears and praying to intel god no mater what you show/present them with. In his case only AMD inquisition will convince his otherwise
well when for eg you know what many cpus get in games that are popular cause you benched them you do have to laugh sometimes.bf1 for eg i benched same map settings in 64 player with 20 modern cpus.the fastest cpu was a x99 cpu not a ryzen.
so will be benching some x299 cpus soon and see how they compare with the ryzen fan bus.
well when for eg you know what many cpus get in games that are popular cause you benched them you do have to laugh sometimes.bf1 for eg i benched same map settings in 64 player with 20 modern cpus.the fastest cpu was a x99 cpu not a ryzen.
so will be benching some x299 cpus soon and see how they compare with the ryzen fan bus.
Thats a blanket assertion for which no prof what so ever exists.
No?
prove it. side by side video. high res so we can see the Image quality, and full OSD so we can see hardware settings. CPU-Z ontop of windows during gamplay.
well when for eg you know what many cpus get in games that are popular cause you benched them you do have to laugh sometimes.bf1 for eg i benched same map settings in 64 player with 20 modern cpus.the fastest cpu was a x99 cpu not a ryzen.
so will be benching some x299 cpus soon and see how they compare with the ryzen fan bus.
We have numerous credible sources saying the same damn thing. Yet we are meant to believe your opinion on it? OK mate.
So, who to believe techreport/hadware unboxed or DG from ocuk? Hmmmm
Last edited by a moderator:
Benchmarks are prof of a products performance, hot air is just vapour.
Until you show proof otherwise I'll look at the results we currently have.
If that was the case then surely you would see that generally the Intel chips are beating the AMD chips in gaming?
No more nuts than going from a Q6600 to an E8400 (that's a yes).
So you think they optimised the game for ryzen when in development. Give over will ya
lolExcept the 7800x cannot beat the much cheaper ryzen 1600. I'm not arguing that intel is faster, my point is DG is calling all those benchmarks/reviews lies lol.