GB is known as a soft country. People think they can get here easily and get benefits etc easy. The government needs to change some policies and we have to toughen up as a nation. Too many openly flaunted human right laws! Break off from the EU too!
Toughen up? That's not a very Christian attitude. I don't think that's something that Jesus would have advocated.
Shoot a few of them, they will soon give up trying to get to England
They should have dummy trains that are really easy to sneak onboard, so all the migrants fall for it. Then those trains should turn off the main tunnel and fall into a pit of lava.
Agreed, the BBC wrote an article a few months back where they had interviewed a number of the immigrants at Calais about their reasons for heading to the UK. Responses such as "free housing", "free money", "free health" and "free education" were very popular responses. So I agree if we can change our policies to make it nigh on impossible for an immigrant to be able to claim these things, it'll make the country less appealing to get to. The problem again though, the EU will not allow us to change these policies.
This is getting serious now, I just don't understand why they not sending in the Army??![]()
aye tbh invading France is always a good idea.
The situation seems totally out of control - these illegal immigrants need to be rounded up and shipped back to Africa.
Meanwhile, Kent is turning into a giant car park, with lorries stacked up on the M20, all alternative routes to the coast jammed solid and people unable to get to work or hospital appointments. A mate of mine who lives near junction 10 of the M20 has had to buy a motorbike to get to work, as driving his car anywhere while operation Stack is in place is impossible.
aye tbh invading France is always a good idea.
For protection and also to protect French police and security at the tunnel.
[TW]Fox;28373211 said:Exactly! It isn't our immigration system that is 'letting these people in'. We could have a 'nobody comes in ever' system and they'd still be attempting entry, thats kinda the point in illegal immigration and why its called 'illegal' immigration.
id say they should use the french army for that but all it would result in is 2000 migrants chasing 4000 french troops down the tunnel in full retreat.
If it provides neither negative nor positives for the Country, but greatly improves the individual in questions quality of life, is it worth enabling? It's a hypothetical really because I've not done enough reading to decide whether immigration provides a net gain or a net cost across all areas.
Well it looks like 148 of them made it through yesterday, Keith Vaz just said!
So that's 1% making it through everyday, say 1000 per week and that's what we know about.
That's 52000 a year, that's a lot of people and its probably treble that with illegals we don't know about.