Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 2,307
My query is whether she was really under duress or not - its easy to take a self righteous stance and say she should have told them she didn't want to get involved when your not in the situation yourself. On the other hand she might have been trying to be "in with the crowd", etc. and deserves some kind of punishment.
She comes from a rich family so she clearly doesn't live near the looters, so how did she get involved with them in the first place? Plus if she was really being forced into doing it then surely she could have driven off while they were looting the shops?
I think the punishment is fair, it shows that even the rich are still accountable for their actions.

I won't type anything it will get me banned.