There seems to have been a lot of debate as to which is the better CPU; the San Diego 3700+ or Venice 3800+. I searched lots of threads but could find none which covered all the following bases...
Firstly, assume I can't be bothered with overclocking. Secondly, assume that I don't do much multitasking save for a concurrence of Winamp, MSN and perhaps Word. Thirdly, this PC wants to be able to do some pretty decent gaming (will be packing an X1800XT as well).
Seems to be a big price difference between the two- but this isnt much of an issue (and no i'm not really interested at an X2 at this point)
Which would I be better off with guys?
Firstly, assume I can't be bothered with overclocking. Secondly, assume that I don't do much multitasking save for a concurrence of Winamp, MSN and perhaps Word. Thirdly, this PC wants to be able to do some pretty decent gaming (will be packing an X1800XT as well).
Seems to be a big price difference between the two- but this isnt much of an issue (and no i'm not really interested at an X2 at this point)
Which would I be better off with guys?