6300 at 3.5 Gig 12 Hour Dual Prime Stable Complete

The Asgard · 6 Aug 2006 at 21:55

Greetings,
This one is for the benifit of EasyRider.

easyrider said:
Its because i can super PI 1 MB @ 4.1ghz with my conroe but I cant get it stable at this speed in prime.

I CAN GET IT STABLE IN PRIME CURRENTLY@ 3.8ghz

I don't believe you are prime stable @ 3.5ghz in prime.

So therfore your clock can pass super PI but has you have shown not prime stable.There is no evidence of this in this thread.

PI calculations mean nothing.

Just put your money where your mouth is and show me a 12hr prime @ 3.5ghz

I will be the first to congratulate on it.

good grief!

Like I said STABLE !

These are images from my desktop, so there Big. I took snapshots throughout the day just in case we have someone else who doesn't believe in me.

Test running for 30 mins

http://www.theasgard.demon.co.uk/prime30mins.JPG

Test Complete

http://www.theasgard.demon.co.uk/12hourfinish.JPG

Never underestimate The Asgard!

gorebrush · 6 Aug 2006 at 21:59

The Asgard did good.

Very good.

ryansm · 6 Aug 2006 at 22:00

impressive mate. Thats a damn good OC!

The Asgard · 6 Aug 2006 at 22:03

I await Easyrider and his 4.1G 32M Pi run

You have had ample time to do it since the challenge this morning my friend

maddness · 6 Aug 2006 at 22:25

nice one mate, i never doubted you

scousegit · 6 Aug 2006 at 22:48

nice clock mate, i've currently got my E6300 running at 3.3ghz, going to prime it for a while see if it is stable.

asgard if your on msn tonight gimme a shout - ( masterfff )

im havin issues with this mobo. (DS4 )

cheers

The Asgard · 6 Aug 2006 at 22:52

scousegit said:
nice clock mate, i've currently got my E6300 running at 3.3ghz, going to prime it for a while see if it is stable.

asgard if your on msn tonight gimme a shout - ( masterfff )

im havin issues with this mobo. (DS4 )

cheers

On now m8

VoG · 7 Aug 2006 at 10:17

The Asgard said:
Test Complete

http://www.theasgard.demon.co.uk/12hourfinish.JPG

holy hell that's a helluva overclock, bet some one comes along & still demands further stability proof.

niecly done dude.

Mr Mister · 7 Aug 2006 at 13:16

The Asgard said:
Test Complete

http://www.theasgard.demon.co.uk/12hourfinish.JPG

Where does it show that its been running for 12hrs?

gorebrush · 7 Aug 2006 at 13:41

system clock.

21:32

The Asgard · 7 Aug 2006 at 15:26

Mr Mister said:
Where does it show that its been running for 12hrs?

Check the clock on the first pic it was running for 30 mins. I have pics throughout the day and I kept the test running a bit longer after the last pic.

The Asgard · 7 Aug 2006 at 15:30

Still no Easyrider, LOL.

Wise man say "Engage Brain Before Opening Mouth"

Bennah · 7 Aug 2006 at 15:32

Good stuff. Very impressive.

Mr Mister · 7 Aug 2006 at 15:35

gorebrush said:
system clock.

21:32

Anyone can change the clock

I believe it is prime stable but thats not very good evidence. If you stopped prime so it said it had been running 12 hrs with no errors etc then it would satisfy.

The Asgard · 7 Aug 2006 at 15:51

Mr Mister said:
Anyone can change the clock

I believe it is prime stable but thats not very good evidence. If you stopped prime so it said it had been running 12 hrs with no errors etc then it would satisfy.

ROFLMAO.

I have 17 pics here spread 1-2 hours apart. Do you want to have a look?

Also if you look at the primes you CANNOT get those factors from restarting. Try doing a torture test youself. It always starts the same.

There is always one! :rolleyes:

easyrider · 7 Aug 2006 at 15:54

The Asgard said:
Still no Easyrider, LOL.

Wise man say "Engage Brain Before Opening Mouth"

I would have thought that you would have shown cpu time in task manager so we can see and clarify how long it has been runnning.

Like mine...

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=7595584&postcount=376

The Asgard · 7 Aug 2006 at 16:00

The Asgard · 7 Aug 2006 at 16:01

easyrider said:
I would have thought that you would have shown cpu time in task manager so we can see and clarify how long it has been runnning.

Like mine...

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=7595584&postcount=376

Is my snapshots through the day not enough ?
Do you still doubt?

Justintime · 7 Aug 2006 at 16:10

Not being nasty, i believe you, but prime can be fooled by changing thes system time, not sure if later versions fixed it but if you change the time during the prime session and stop it, it'll reflect the time difference, i.e you started at 9 and changed the time to 11, stop prime and it'll say test ran for 2 hours.

The Asgard · 7 Aug 2006 at 16:18

Really cant get my breath

Look at the prime results. Look at the times. Look how many have been done? Look at the FFT length. How do you frig them?

Really disappointed with some of the comments.

Some people just have not got a clue