A single nuclear weapon has “gone missing”

A nuke will be launched as an attack within 50 years in my opinion. Tensions are rising, resources are running out and I think Iran just want to test one on real people for the hell of it.
 
It's in my pants. ;)

Also,

Tefal said:
TO BE FAIR THIS IS A WEBSITE THAT HAS AN ARTICLE TITLED "WERE REAL PEOPLE MURDERED ON 9/11" THJEN GOES ON TO SAY THAT THE SENSIBLE IDEA IS THAT no one REALLY DIED EXCEPT FOR A FEW....

caps loc and i cant be arsed to retype.
Click to expand...

How did you not realise it was in caps at any point during that huge sentence?
 
Last edited:
Septym said:
A nuke will be launched as an attack within 50 years in my opinion. Tensions are rising, resources are running out and I think Iran just want to test one on real people for the hell of it.
Click to expand...

Iran won't though, it will be Israel that turns a country to glass a long time before Iran ever would. In the modern history of Iran's wars they have never been the first to instigate military action.

Soviet Invasion of Persia -(1920-1921)-The new Communist regime in Russia (now renamed as the Soviet Union), invaded northern Persia and established Soviet satellite states in Gilan, Kurdistan, Azerbaijan, and Khorasan. Following the coup of Persian General Reza Khan Pahlavi in February of 1921, a peace treaty with the Soviets was ratified, and Soviet forces withdrew.

Anglo-Soviet Invasion and Occupation of Persia -(1941-1946)-The Soviet Union and the United Kingdom once again occupied large areas of Iran due to their war with Germany during World War Two. This time, no combat took place in Iranian territory, but the Soviets did aid separatist movements among the Kurds and Azeris.

Anti-Mossadeq Coup -(1953)--The American Central Intelligence Agency planned and executed a coup against Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadeq. Britain was concerned that Mossadeq was going to nationalize the oilfields of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now known as British Petroleum, or BP) and the United States feared that Mossadeq may ally Iran with the Soviet Union. The plan for the coup was called "Operation Ajax," and it succeeded in overthrowing Prime Minister Mossadeq and installing a more pliable Prime Minister. The Shah assumed greater powers, and Iran was a firm ally of the Western powers during the Cold War until the Shah's overthrow in 1979.

The First Persian Gulf War (also known as the Iran-Iraq War)—(1980-1988) - In 1975, Iraq and Iran came to an agreement on the disputed Shatt al-Arab waterway which provides Iraq’s only outlet to the sea. In exchange for Iran stopping support for Kurdish rebels, Iraq agreed to share the Shatt al-Arab with Iran. This and other disputes over their common border, plus the belief that the 1979 revolution had weakened Iran, led Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to launch an invasion of Iran on September 22, 1980.
Click to expand...

You can see that the last few major engagements they have had have all been down to either western interference or another power wanting a piece of them. I don't think Iran are going to go out of their way to nuke anyone.

There's more chance of those Zionist zealot nut cases doing it
 
Isn't the non proliferation treaty pointless for a lot of countries. Are we to believe that countries like Germany and Japan couldn't make nuclear weapons at will within months if not weeks.
 
Jokester said:
Yeah, because a 100kt nuclear blast could pass as another plane crash.
Click to expand...

I clicked on the OP's link purely out of a sense of bewilderment after reading your quote. Surely nobody could be seriously suggesting that a 100Kt nuclear blast could be passed off as a plane crash? You must have been mistaken somehow. But no, that's exactly what was written in the article. A 100Kt nuclear blast, in Manhattan of all places, being something that could be passed off as another plane crash. A nuclear blast about 7 times as powerful as the one that devastated Hiroshima, detonated in Manhattan...sure, that could so easily be mistaken for a plane crash by everyone.

The fact that they could put that in the article is compelling evidence that the whole article is drivel written by someone without the slightest hint of a clue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom