Caporegime
Indeed, they can't penalise Red Bull or Max but they could argue the last laps weren't run in accordance with the rules and should be discounted.
IIRC, didn't they do this before over a chequered flag infringement?
Indeed, they can't penalise Red Bull or Max but they could argue the last laps weren't run in accordance with the rules and should be discounted.
Ricciardo having to spend 2 weeks in hotel lockdown in Perth...
Poor sod...
Something dodgy with Perez's car being retired without ANY warning....
Why?
It's very simple - they line up behind or 48.12 can be invoked to let lapped cars pass.
If you're arguing 48.12 wasn't invoked, then they should have lined up as per 48.10.
Yes, Canada a few years ago was called at 68 laps instead of 70 because they cocked up the flagIIRC, didn't they do this before over a chequered flag infringement?
Some conspiracy theorists have entered the chat.Something dodgy with Perez's car being retired without ANY warning....
as a neutral what a race.
i absolutely do not mind max being WDC, in fact its quite nice to see something new.
but obviously we have the controversy.
I think you're correct but the trouble is that AFAICT not doing that is in itself an infringement. I also can not see anything that lets Masi make up a rule for people to pass other than that one.
That was a chequered flag being waved too early. A very, very different scenario.Yes, Canada a few years ago was called at 68 laps instead of 70 because they cocked up the flag
Things are calming down then. Someone earlier said he should be shot.imho whoever made that last lap decision needs to be fired, tomorrow.
and we need new rules, the biggest being, no pit stops under SC.
and we need new rules, the biggest being, no pit stops under SC.
Some conspiracy theorists have entered the chat.
What kind are you going to claim?
It’s the rules and it is actually down as a quote, so yes that phrase needs to be used, it’s quite simple. It is to avoid confusion. To be honest there is probably a button for it on the messaging system because of that very reason.Oh come off if, if the race director hasn’t shown the exact wording then the rule doesn’t apply?
Like trying to send someone off on a football pitch but you can’t because their name is misspelt on their jersey.
and we need new rules, the biggest being, no pit stops under SC.
What’s the issue with wanting to know why? Red bull have said it was both a water and oil warning despite these occurring at the same time almost unheard of AND Perez himself claiming there was nothing wrong with the car. At a time when it was hugely beneficial for RB. Warrants answers surely.
This wouldn't be such a big problem if the rules were known and consistent. Merc made the right call as there was not enough time for the race to finish (within the rules) either with all cars unlapped or Max still to take them all over.
Merc made the decision for Lewis based on the rules. Not the imaginary way things should work in Masi's head.
Only someone that has little interest in the sport can say this. Never in any sport is it simply nice to have someone new winning, that’s a totally ridiculous viewpoint that sounds like someone’s elderly mother would make. You want the best participant to win, irrespective of how regularly they win… in this instance this was obviously LH and Mercedes. Sport isn’t about letting the other guy have win just to make it more exciting!
What I find even more crazy , is that does that not COMPLETELY screw up the driver behind Max? It means all the cars they were racing ahead are now miles ahead!
They didn't know that at all. They could have gone back to racing with two laps to go if they wanted too, but they chose to sweep away some more of the fire extinguisher. The track was otherwise clear and ready to go.