He did say equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. Isn't that what you're always espousing?
Perhaps you should re read the quote in your post?
Equality of opportunity is a better ideal then equality of outcome but is still a eutopian, unobtainable goal.
People aren't equal and you can't artificially make them so. Attempts at making people more equal, opportunity wise, generally necessitate the more gifted and capable being pulled down towards the lowest common denominator.
I don't espouse equality of opportunity because I don't beleive in it generally....I have previously mentioned it in preference to equality of outcome but reject both now for the reasons stated.
For example in education I would support spending more money on gifted children as I believe society as a whole benefits from promoting and excellence where possible.
I am also not against more resources being provided to deprived or special needs children to try and promote them being more active in general society as adults.
I just don't think you can aim for equality of outcome.. You can aim for more optimal outcomes for the people concerned with the resources available however