frogboy said:
I really don't get what the fuss is about.
The fuss, in my case is not about the extra time and searches. I have for many years been an advocate of the Israeli security checks and believe we should have implemented them years ago.
For me it's about the totally illogical security measures they have just because they have to be seen to be doing something even if it is totally flawed.
Why is the new carry on size any safer than the old one? Maybe it's just a coincidence that it is laptop size so not to upset a very large part of the air industry's income, the business traveller.
Why strip you of all liquids groundside then allow you to buy up loads more airside? Barmy when airside workers are not as well checked as the passengers. How hard is it to smuggle stuff airside when you work there?
Why on earth did they inflict the same security on the air-crew? I mean, if they wanted to kill a few 100 people as well as themselves they've had plenty of opportunity to do it without hair-gel and toothpaste. Steering the plane into the ground does a good job.
Why should I put my expensive belongings in to the hold when they've been telling us for decades not to? They cannot guarantee that my baggage will get to its destination intact, whether by physical damage or theft. Apparently reported theft from luggage went up 200% at Gatwick alone during that week. In fact, I would be happy to put my £7000 of camera gear in the hold in a locked hardcase if BAA could guarantee the honesty of their own staff and the security of my gear, but they can't! How did Heathrow get the nickname Thiefrow? Surely it cannot be undeserved? If they can't stop the thieving, what makes them think they can stop a terrorist attack airside from one of their own staff in the future?
I could rant on a bit longer, but you get the picture.
And just to stress once more, I'm all for Israeli style security. They haven't had a hijacking or lost a plane in decades. I know it takes even longer, and I don't have a problem with checking in even earlier.