• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD CEO Dirk Meyer Resigns

Take the fastest GPU crown? what card is that then.

AMD are saying he got the boot because they are not happy with profits and their lowly position in the market.

You know full well what card is being refered to. Also, wanting to establish market leadership is hardly the same as wanting to climb from their lowly position of having waaaay over 50% of DX11 market share.

Nice to see you're firmly back in the green camp after your pre 69xx **** stirring.
 
You know full well what card is being refered to. Also, wanting to establish market leadership is hardly the same as wanting to climb from their lowly position of having waaaay over 50% of DX11 market share.

Nice to see you're firmly back in the green camp after your pre 69xx **** stirring.

Calm down lol, I'm quoting the BBC news LMAO, and I think we're talking CPUs here, GPUs are small fry in comparison, especially the DX11 market currently.
 
Well its not because of any of the bottom three and ATI seem to be shifting huge amount of 6900 cards.

The timing is very strange though with the all new northern islands cards just round the corner, and ATI just about to take the fastest GPU crown, although it has been a while since ATI put much value to titles. I would have at least waited until after the HD6990 and then gone when people started to focus on the 7000 cards.

And as we all know the highend 6xxx cards are such a huge and central part of AMD's business.
 
I'm very surprised and I highly doubt it's down to the performance of the 69xx cards (rolls eyes) as there still profitable.

If this is down to business reasons then it will be a combination of the consistent losses AMD have racked up over the last 3 years under his leadership (baring last year when they got $1 billion from Intel but that's a non trading revenue income) and ignoring the expanding non x86 based products market which Nvidia are jumping on with ARM and Google.

Given how unexpected this is though I doubt it is for business reasons (I'm not buying the AMD Press release PR nonsense) more like he's done something highly controversial which we won't find out about for a few years.
 
All the articles I read which included quotes from people high up at AMD seem to suggest he was pushed as he wasn't getting AMD to where they wanted to be fast enough

Although AMD said Meyer resigned, the company's ensuing statements on the matter suggest that he may have been pushed out.

“The board feels we’ve got opportunities for significant growth and superior financial returns, and a change in leadership can accelerate the ability to accomplish those goals,” Drew Prairie, an AMD spokesman, said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. “We’re marching in the right direction, but the issue was just with the pace and finding ways to accelerate the pace.”

AMD's channel partners asked whether a change in leadership will translate to AMD achieving its goal of gaining a larger share of the market.

"It is very hard to say from an outsiders view if this change will have any impact," said Larry Piland, president of Datel Systems, a San Diego, Calif.-based solution provider. "Is it a CEO issue that has kept AMD from realizing their full potential or is it a board issue that steers the company in a given direction?"

According to a report from Bloomberg on Tuesday, AMD is seeking a CEO who can challenge Intel in the traditional CPU market, while getting AMD processors inside mobile embedded devices. The report said AMD's board was frustrated during Meyer's tenure with the company's inability to gain market share in the tablet segment in particular.
 
Its impossible to know really, in the last two years they could have put a REAL hurt on Nvidia if they were real players in the professional market. Seeing as the 5870, and now the 6970 actually have a LOT of gpgpu features that support all the same standards as Nvidia, they should have been a little more active there aswell. But its the professional market they should have invested in before now, they could have made a lot more cash with cards they already make, on top of taking cash away from Nvidia which could easily in the past couple years have taken Nvidia from profit to loss in many quarters.

While AMD are doing well on various products AND Bulldozer and its derivitives look set to be fantastic, I get the impression AMD have spent a shedload more than they needed to on Llano, which is essentially dead before it started, and the 40nm Ontario/Zacate, while making a LOT of headway are incredibly shortlived for 40nm and will be on 28nm very shortly afterwards, on a different process at a different fab which will cost a lot to port.

This is largely as Llano was delayed, alongside normal Phenoms one, maybe two years ago it would be a great part, with Bulldozer out before Llano, its dead, a quad Bulldozer with gpu would spank a Llano in probably every single way. They are now pushing essentially a already dead part as their top end fusion part, then either keeping it for face for a couple years, or canning it as soon as they can get a gpu on Bulldozer which seems the preferential way forward for AMD.

But anyway, I said its impossible to know, if Meyer has, say, cancer and needs time off to be with family, then saying so would be admiting to the shareholders that he's the guy we absolutely need, but we can't have him. Thats a BAD message to send, really really bad. If he was moving to GloFo for a bigger fee/better job, which is more than possible, they'd probably talk it up about how the links between the future leader of world fabrication will be run by a guy who loves AMD and has heavy links with them, etc, etc.

If he was going to Intel/Nvidia/Arm, its unlikely as Meyer has been a AMD fanboy for a LONG time, then they'd want to write it off as he wasn't doing well and the board want to go a new direction.

If the board actually thinks they can make more money but pushing harder into certain markets, then thats what they'd say as it sounds like a positive move.

Basically the reasons for these things tend to be hidden because, leaving for the wrong reasons can hurt a company pretty damn badly in terms of stock price and market confidence.

Even Fud is talking up Bulldozer now, Bulldozer sets to be quite early and can probably lead Intel at least till Q4, thats a BIG deal, Ontario/Zacate despite being expensive and shortlived are great cores that turn AMD from also rans into market leaders on performance, price and right on par with battery life(maybe ahead for powerful gpu usage, gaming, hd video).

It seems unlikely that something big and epic will happen in terms of product failures, firstly Meyer is good at his job and secondly we know the mobile parts ARE good, everyone in the know is saying Bulldozer is good, their gpu's are good. Llano is potentially a big bag of failure, but then its dead in the water so who really cares all that much.
 
So glad this wasnt an nVidia CEO. There would be posts upon posts of laughter and ridicule if it was, because its AMD its more serious and if you say anything your a troll.

That's basically the way it works around here, isnt it ?
 
So glad this wasnt an nVidia CEO. There would be posts upon posts of laughter and ridicule if it was, because its AMD its more serious and if you say anything your a troll.

That's basically the way it works around here, isnt it ?

If it was the nVidia CEO people would probably rejoyce to be rid of the idiot that's bringing nVidia down
 
All the articles I read which included quotes from people high up at AMD seem to suggest he was pushed as he wasn't getting AMD to where they wanted to be fast enough

That's actually quite interesting thanks for posting that.

From that article it does look like AMD's lack of presence in the non x86 based devices market (around about 20% of the total CPU market now) is why he's getting the push as there are no indicators that AMD had plans to enter this growing market. Bobcat could be used in this environment but as yet there no concrete plans on the table but with Nvidia partnership deal with ARM and Google gone through you have to wonder if AMD would have left it to late and when they did enter the market will have already been saturated by ARM devices.

(BTW as of right now I'm self declared ARM fanboy from now on. Screw AMD, screw Intel patriotic pride has taken over ARM ***, rule Britannia)

Another theory thrown by Anandtech is that the board want to sell AMD to ATIC (owns Global Foundries) and Dirk as CEO may have been an obstacle.
 
Back
Top Bottom