• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**AMD Radeon 390X Graphics Card WCE**

Definitely more excited about the 390x after seeing the Titan X results.

I think AMD will absolutely smash it at 4K.

yea i cant say i'm jealous and it looks like about 800 quid.... it's about what i thought it would be performance wise..

when the hype dies down over there and they've all got their TZs, i think you'll find that some of them might regret it.................. esp in June :cool:

come on AMD, you can do it.......................kick ***
 
Last edited:
I had a HIS 7950 IceQ it was ****ing awesome. It was my first high end graphics card, good value and good performance. Loved the cooler. Even though the blue theme was pretty cool.


I've still got them in crossfire, and still incredibly powerful for the price. Can make the max out my 144hz 1440p screen on half my games with them, that to me is win win.
 
Last edited:
As much as I'd like to think AMD will/can "pull an athlon" on the TX, I just dont see it happening tbh :(

I know on paper it looks the part, but.....

Hope am wrong :eek::D
 
Going to echo a few users on the Titan X and say for over £600 "these are not the cards your looking for"

Oh well AMD, impress me, just bloody well hurry up because I'm fairly certain the 980ti will be too tempting.
 
**** me there's some people on their periods earlier in this thread.

I always read posts by Kaapsted like he was a well thought out person but the passive aggressive is strong!

I'm no tech expert, but the points DM made were perfectly reasonable and if what he says is true (the 12 month development for a board) then it's quite clear that part of the article is just BS designed to fuel the AMD vs Nvidia fire. Also surprised at how many people come across as if they're in their teens in this thread.



I had a HIS 7950 IceQ it was ****ing awesome. It was my first high end graphics card, good value and good performance. Loved the cooler. Even though the blue theme was pretty cool.

I'm sure they had 4,6 & 8GB configs for the top SKU of this generation in development. Which they action depends on a number of factors. A 4GB 390 and an 8GB 390X is most likely IMO given the info we have.

Also, it appears more likely that NVIDIA went with the ludicrous 12GB on the Titan X because they knew there was no way they could compete in performance with the HBM cards, so needed an OMG BIG NUMBER that AMD wouldn't bother to compete with. Not the other way around ....
 
Also, it appears more likely that NVIDIA went with the ludicrous 12GB on the Titan X because they knew there was no way they could compete in performance with the HBM cards, so needed an OMG BIG NUMBER that AMD wouldn't bother to compete with. Not the other way around ....

Anandtech reckon the Titan X has +33% performance over the 980. Not an awful result, but nothing groundbreaking when I was expecting +50%. It appears to scale well with overclocking (hello 980ti with higher clocks), but i'll be surprised if the 390X doesn't beat the Titan X convincingly.
 
``Just seen the reviews...man the performance is great, the cooling is crap.
Throttling at 84C...have to run abot 90..and its noisy. Thats a tough one to explain after all the 290ref bashing.``

but it gets very good reviews...... i've only just read them, so this post has been redone
 
Last edited:
Are HIS even around anymore, they only got 1 card for sale on OCUK?

Yes I talk to them often as the directors are good friends of mine, they just did not realise how much the EU wanted black PCB and as such blue PCB has meant very low numbers.

I hope however for 3xx series HIS shall be back and strong as they are now converted to black PCB. A great brand who have had some superb cooling solutions in the past. :)
 
Anandtech reckon the Titan X has +33% performance over the 980. Not an awful result, but nothing groundbreaking when I was expecting +50%. It appears to scale well with overclocking (hello 980ti with higher clocks), but i'll be surprised if the 390X doesn't beat the Titan X convincingly.

+33% seems about right (maybe a tad high) averaging accross all the resolutions. lower perf improvement relative to the 980 at smaller res and the difference increasing as you go up in resolution.

Honestly, expect similar performance. AMD's 'one ring to rule them all' GCN means some die space dedicated to dp capability not so useful to gaming. I'd be interested to know the effect of their 4096 wide I/O in comparison to the gddr5 mem controller wrt die area. They may be able to up clocks a little with power savings from HBM (vs a hypothetical fiji with gddr5) and I am sure will use up as much of the power limit as they can as they did with Hawaii.
 
Last edited:
Yes I talk to them often as the directors are good friends of mine, they just did not realise how much the EU wanted black PCB and as such blue PCB has meant very low numbers.

I hope however for 3xx series HIS shall be back and strong as they are now converted to black PCB. A great brand who have had some superb cooling solutions in the past. :)

People really care that much for it to significantly effect sales?

That's insane... Send me a Noctua branded one completed in prophetic limp beige and I'll buy it if its the best cooler at a good price.
 
Yes I talk to them often as the directors are good friends of mine, they just did not realise how much the EU wanted black PCB and as such blue PCB has meant very low numbers.

I hope however for 3xx series HIS shall be back and strong as they are now converted to black PCB. A great brand who have had some superb cooling solutions in the past. :)

Am glad they'll be back soon, quality brand!! Blue pcb was a bad bad mistake, but they probably know that!!! :D
 
Yeah bit strange for NV to show their hand this early.

If Fiji ends up being faster AMD will have a year+ of superiority to lord over them.

My personal view on this is the following, but this is my personal view.

NVIDIA TitanX was coming, always was but expected much later and now its being sprung upon us and the price could be half decent, especially if around £799 inc. vat in the UK. :)

I feel that maybe AMD have had a change of heart, realised that most board partners have sold their 290 series stocks of at cost or below to etailors who have also sold 290 series at low margins to hit all time lows of sub £300 for an 8GB 290X, well at least at OcUK. ;)

As such AMD have realised they have a product they can launch far sooner as now it won't hurt sales even if they launch 390X at 290X pricing as 290X is £500 area and I expect 390X 8GB HBM 4k Edition to be around £600 and worth every penny for the outrageous performance it will offer.

NVIDIA have probably gotten wind of this and even though TitanX is also a mighty card I feel the TitanX and 390X will trade blows with TitanX upper-hand being in compute and the additional 4GB VRAM buffer. As such NVIDIA need to get TitanX to market first, to well be first and grab the early adopters and at anything under £800 its a great buy. But I suspect 390X will have similar performance and cost less, where NVIDIA will potentially own the AMD card is on power consumption, but me myself as an overclocker and gamer, well power consumption is no concern to me, that is why we sell 2000W 8 Pack power supplies. ;)

What excites me more is the potential of NVIDIA releasing a new TitanZ with a pair of TitanX onboard with 12GB as 6GB VRAM per GPU would be acceptable and that would be insanely powerful and around £1500 which is same as current TitanZ pricing which sells fine. :)
 
Last edited:
My personal view on this is the following, but this is my personal view.

NVIDIA TitanX was coming, always was but expected much later and now its being sprung upon us and the price could be half decent, especially if around £799 inc. vat in the UK. :)

I feel that maybe AMD have had a change of heart, realised that most board partners have sold their 290 series stocks of at cost or below to etailors who have also sold 290 series at low margins to hit all time lows of sub £300 for an 8GB 290X, well at least at OcUK. ;)

As such AMD have realised they have a product they can launch far sooner as now it won't hurt sales even if they launch 390X at 290X pricing as 290X is £500 area and I expect 390X 8GB HBM 4k Edition to be around £600 and worth every penny for the outrageous performance it will offer.

NVIDIA have probably gotten wind of this and even though TitanX is also a might car I feel the TitanX and 390X will trade blows with TitanX upper-hand being in compute and the additional 4GB VRAM buffer. But as such NVIDIA need to get TitanX to market first, to well be first and grab the early adopters and at anything under £800 its a great buy. But I suspect 390X will have similar performance and cost less, where NVIDIA will potentially own the AMD card is on power consumption, but me myself as an overclocker and gamer, well power consumption is no concern to me, that is why we sell 2000W 8 Pack power supplies. ;)

What excites me more is the potential of NVIDIA releasing a new TitanZ with a pair of TitanX onboard with 12GB as 6GB VRAM per card would be acceptable and that would be insanely powerful and around £1500 which is same as current TitanZ pricing which sells fine. :)


NV will have the 980ti 6GB out to counter the 390x.

12GB on the TX is overkill, having an extra 4GB over the 8GB 390X is irrelevant as far as gaming is concerned.

Titan Z was a failure, too expensive and low clocks. Can't see them doing another with the TX.
 
Last edited:
If nvidia and amd can do this on 28nm it makes me quite excited to see what happens after they shrink it all down.

Clock speeds reduce as will OC performance if Intel CPU's are anything to go by. As you shrink the platform and have less leakage can also mean less OC ability with cooling technology the market is currently using.
 
Back
Top Bottom