$349 makes more sense.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
$349 makes more sense.
hehe.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Oct 2013
- Posts
- 4,162
- Location
- Scotland
You want ~10% more performance for ~35% less? Why would that make sense to a business trying to make money?
because it can do ray tracing which navi cant do it seems.
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2018
- Posts
- 1,149
- Location
- South
CPU's = YAY
GPU's = NAY
Bored now - Bed time
Night all
GPU's = NAY
Bored now - Bed time
Night all
So much fail at 449. Was just gonna throw it on the card but damn. They went with Nvidia gouging.
However, some nice features they introduced on Navi. But still... Too high. Besting the card that is gonna get heavily discounted very shortly lol.
However, some nice features they introduced on Navi. But still... Too high. Besting the card that is gonna get heavily discounted very shortly lol.
Thats faster than it was around 95
Bargain
thats the main difference, one does ray tracing one does. at the same price point. so if you want ray tracing you go for the rtx card. have to see how well it performs when its benched and tweaked. but id maybe another $50 off and they have a winner.
Well on NAVI you can play at 1fps for same price your point ??
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 885
Because raytracing from Nvidia has been so successful so far.
its not but NAvi got nothing at all from what I'w just seen and cost same so ??