which amps have you tested the ns1000 on ?
i now people on head fi are saying the e9 etc works nice with hd600/650 etc though
Working well with the HD600 and other demanding headphones means very little for the NS1000s in passive mode. Their electrical characteristics are very different. Plus, if unamped, the HD600s still sound OK (although not spectacular).
With the wrong source or amp, the NS1000s with ANR off (as I think you know) sound
dismal.
I haven't tried the NS1000s with that many headphone amps, especially higher end ones.
I'll summarise a few amps and sources that I have tried with them:
FiiO e5 - pretty good
Juice 2214 CMOY - pretty good - slightly better than the e5
Bravo v1 Tube amp - dismal
Various Yamaha and Sony AV amps - dismal
Xonar D2 - dismal
X-Fi Prelude - dismal
Sansa Clip - not too bad but loses bass control
Sansa Clip+ - sligthly worse than original Sansa Clip
Sony Erricson w850i phone - Surprisingly good. Not on par with e5 though.
Victor SU-DH1 - Pretty good but not quite as clear as E5.
Mackie 402-VLZ3 - poor to middling.
For a long time I've been puzzled as to why amps that do well with other headphones (the Mackie and Bravo in particular sound very good with my HD600s and DT770 Pro/250s) do so badly with the NS1000s with ANR off. I have a few ideas.
One is that many cheaper amps (and indeed some more specialist expensive ones) are designed to either perform well with voltage or current controlled headphones. I think the NS1000s with ANR off need a bit of both.
Secondly 100 ohms is an odd middling impedance for a headphone. Many headphone amps (especially headphone outs built into other stuff) have relatively high output impedances. 120 ohms is the nearest thing to standard but there isn't one really. 100 ohms is a nominal impedance. In reality the headphones will be slightly different impedance for different frequencies. Where the output impedance of an amp coincides with the input impedance of a headphone, strange things can happen to the frequency response: see here for details:
http://www.avguide.com/blog/why-headphone-amps-sound-different-frequency-responseimpedance-issues Relatively few headphone amps seem to list output impedance in their specs but I think it may be significant. It will not be as significant for higher impedance headphones like HD600s. I think the rule of thumb is it's better to get a headphone amp with as low an output impedance as possible to avoid weird interactions.
Thirdly - and jamesmiller may disagree with me on this one - the NS1000s in passive mode seem to be oddly power hungry. Maximum power input on the phones is rated as 300mW. That's 50% more than HD600s and 3x that of my 250 ohm Beyerdynamics. Most headphone amps can't put out anything like 300mW. In reality you would never use that, as the headphones or your ears would start taking damage first, but it's nice to have some headroom for dynamics eh? I discussed this with the guy who makes Neco Soundlabs amps (for sale on the bay) and he seemed to think that it did have some importance. He indicated that he thought his 9v portable amp would be stretching to its limits with these headphones and that his 18v portable amp would be more suitable. Who knows eh? Maybe he was just trying to sell me something more expensive...