Oh please please tell me it was a copy of this:I really wanna know what the item was now.
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51EUDeaeojL._SX315_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh please please tell me it was a copy of this:I really wanna know what the item was now.
Now given that I already have a letter before action template ready for exactly this kind of thing and the cost and effort of going to court is so small at a mere £25 it seems like a small price to pay to destroy this guy's credit rating even if I never get compensated for the loss he caused me.
when I could have the money in investment accounts accruing interest?
Yeah i know, wasn't have a dig yourself. Ebay is a really strange place for buying and selling.
If i'm selling something i always watch a bunch of the same item before to see how much they go for and what condition then base my price around that. But i've seen prices differentiate massively like over £200 sometimes, just depends what time of day it is and who wants it.
I really wanna know what the item was now.
Individual experiences of small claims aren't going to help you. The same case before two different judges could end up with two different results.
If I told you I had a similar case, and lost, I doubt it wouldn't make a ha'p'orth of difference to what you're going to do.
He was honest with you, does that make him truly contemptible?
For 99.99% of us this wouldn't be worth the candle but, as I said, you're a man on a mission. A mission to destroy this guy for his honesty.
No. A contemptible individual would have broken the item and then opened an Item Not As Described case against you, claiming it arrived that way - resulting in you being out of pocket for shipping both ways, plus stuck with an item worth significantly less than before.
Which is exactly what you'll be encouraging them to do if you decide to try and punish them for their honesty.
Also if you are selling as a business (which it sounds like, since you mention it affecting your cashflow), then they are absolutely within their rights to "on a whim to change their mind". If not, then perhaps you need to look at budgeting better so that you aren't reliant on ad-hoc Ebay sales to manage your personal finances - after all, what would you have done if the item hadn't sold?
There was more to it than that, he tried to make a derisory offer for less than the item ended up selling for, which completely contradicted his own story, if he had changed his mind then why start trying to negotiate below the market value? "Chancer" comes to mind.
People will try it on to save some money. Doesn't mean they deserve to have their credit rating nerfed. You have to accept that you'll come across messers and chancers on eBay.
Please. This is a contemptible individual who decided ex post facto to change their mind. This is not some poor person who has fallen on hardship who I would be fully sympathetic with, they decided on a whim to change their mind in their own words. They are basically everything wrong with he eBay platform distilled.
Nor does he have to, there is plenty of room for negotiation before initiating court proceedings.
People seem to be under the wrong impression here. If a judgement is made and the defendant pays there is no impact on credit rating. The persons credit rating is only damaged if they fail to comply with the courts directions.
at a mere £25 it seems like a small price to pay to destroy this guy's credit rating even if I never get compensated for the loss he caused me.
People seem to be under the wrong impression here.
Now given that I already have a letter before action template ready for exactly this kind of thing and the cost and effort of going to court is so small at a mere £25 it seems like a small price to pay to destroy this guy's credit rating even if I never get compensated for the loss he caused me.
I don't think we are.