Are digital camera's worth getting repaired ? And spec me a new £250 please......

Associate
Joined
25 Feb 2006
Posts
1,123
Location
Sydney
My Fuji Finepix camera (at work at the moment so don't know which model) has just stopped working and I'm wondering if, like most other electricals, it's not really worth the cost or effort of getting repaired. I bought it refurbished over a year ago for about £150 so I'm thinking it's probably time to upgrade anyway.

If thats the case, can you spec me a good camera around the £250 mark ?

Cheers
 
where do you live?

reason I ask as I went in to the main photgraphy shop in Hanley, about my cam (olympus c-740) that has a hair inside the viewfinder

He told me to try a little place near wolstanton, That do repairs quite cheap.


I dont know if they are considered to be a competitor to overclockers or not, I would doubt it (and i dont know the name of it anyway) considering that they repair cameras.

the best place ever was that little shop in hanley, by what used to be video world. think it was called tarts, but it appears to have closed down, I have been to the shop 5 or 6 times at varying times since november and it is always closed :(
 
London. I'm thinking that it's probably not worth the trouble, given that it's a few years old now.

Think I'll do some more research for a replacement !

A camera repair shop called Tarts ?? LOL........ you sure ?
 
For £250 I would look very seriously at the Sony H2 or H5. Check out dpreview.com for reviews and the forums there for extensive user opinions.

dpreview.com said:
(H5 review extract)

The good news is that everything we liked about the H1 and the H2 is still here; handling is excellent, it's very fast and responsive and the results - even shooting in full auto mode with default settings - excellent. There are few cameras I can wholeheartedly recommend to both novice 'snappers' and experienced photographers, but the H5, like the H2, is that rarest of beasts; a 'compact' camera with handling and control close to a DSLR, yet one that - even in inexperienced hands - can be left in 'idiot-proof' mode and trusted to produce the goods time and time again. Above all, the H5 is fun and easy to use, which means you will find yourself taking a lot more pictures, which has to be a good thing...

...Compared to the most obvious competitors - the Canon S3 IS and Panasonic DMC-FZ7 - the Sony H5 scores highly in handling, features, overall image quality and ease of use, and only really falls short in a couple of areas; burst mode, focus speed in low light (specifically at the long end of the zoom), and the purple fringing. The Canon S3IS wins hands-down when it coes to movies, the FZ7's lens and superior image stabilization means that at lower ISO settings it still, just, rules the roost when it comes to edge-to-edge sharpness, but the H5 offers a very attractive overall package that handles better than either, and - if that's what you like in a camera - has that nice big screen to boot.
 
I just got the H2 for Christmas and love it :) Tis my first semi-proper camera and have to say it is ace.

From some of the reviews I read, they said it wasnt worth the extra for the H5 as all that was different is a slightly bigger screen.

here are some sample shots I have taken since xmas with the H2

http://dmccabe.deviantart.com
 
Jaap74 said:
Been looking at this one : Canon IXUS 850 IS

Any thoughts ??

acording to the reports itsvery softon the edges at most focal lengths, but in particular at the 28mm wide angle.

cmt
 
Back
Top Bottom