to many planning regs is the number 1 issue. Closely followed by lack of renting regulations. Thirdly the amount you can borrow and the help to buy schemes just artificially keep prices high.Whats the answer then?
to many planning regs is the number 1 issue. Closely followed by lack of renting regulations. Thirdly the amount you can borrow and the help to buy schemes just artificially keep prices high.Whats the answer then?
Whats the answer then?
Whats the answer then?
Regulation to maintain the property market at stable levels, higher stamp duties, lending controls etc when the market needs cooling off.
Planning reform and whatever else is necessary to get house-building up to the required levels to meet demand.
Rental controls and other increased rights for tenants.
More efforts to divert investment from London outwards.
Sensible building, more European good-sized mixed-use townhouses (increase housing density in towns without going full high-rise or covering the landscape in pointless semi-detached shoeboxes)
Scrap help to buy and other nonsense.
Not rocket science.
UK housing madness mentality summed up in one post. I really wish you could show people what life is like outside the UK property porn bubble, but you just don't see it when you're on the inside.
It's really sad that so many people in the UK just can't comprehend that it's possible to live well, have clothes and holidays and cars and go out, not spend half your life commuting, AND have an affordable roof over your head. Collective insanity.
unfortunately, everyone is left with no option but to just get on with it, the chance of it changing anytime soon is pretty much zero. Most people just see their wealth going up, even though you cant access it and it decreases what most can do in life.I am just waiting for a mortgage offer on a shared ownership place. It is not ideal but its the only affordable option at this moment and its cheaper than full rental. I like the things you mention above but will they happen?
Lots of other factors involved as well with housing:One of the problems is the housing market isn't affected quite the same way by supply and demand as most if not all other commodities - ultimately someone needs a roof over their head and have a lot less choice in going with other options, going without or going with something cheaper i.e. if they have to have a 3 bedroom house for decency as their kids grow up that doesn't leave them many options and they are much more at the mercy of rising prices. Maybe we should by regulation inject a simulation of demand into the housing market.
Please do enlighten me? In your view, what is 'living well'. What is your view of an affordable roof over your head. Then what do you consider to be a good comfortable salary to achieve this wonderful easy existence? Also if the roof you speak of is rented, how are you going to pay the rent when your 65+?
There's no point at all comparing to other countries as we dont live in other countries. Unless you're proposing we all move abroad ?
Housing isn't the issue is it.
People complaining in this thread are at the very least on the internet so I think its safe to assume are also housed.
Housing isn't the issue is it.
People complaining in this thread are at the very least on the internet so I think its safe to assume are also housed.
I have shown you. you can buy a flat in Scotland for £10K a 2 bedroom for £15K, yes they aren't buckingham palace or in nice areas but it shows you, that you can buy a flat on less than 1 years wage.
Yes, it is, this is what the thread is about.
This is a problem.
For comparison....a somewhat more crude but also insightful comparison :
http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/Europe/germany/price-gdp-per-cap
To be fair, interest rates have gone from 4% in 2002 when your graph starts to 0.25% currently. Deposit aside (which is definitely an issue, and one which there have been various attempts to counter), the payments on a mortgage would be a lot closer than your graph indicates. e.g asssuming 10% deposit A tracker at 1.5%+base rate would be £553/month for a 100K house in 2002 or £667/month on a 180K house now. That is actually less than the median gross annual salary increase in your graph.
To be fair, interest rates have gone from 4% in 2002 when your graph starts to 0.25% currently. Deposit aside (which is definitely an issue, and one which there have been various attempts to counter), the payments on a mortgage would be a lot closer than your graph indicates. e.g asssuming 10% deposit A tracker at 1.5%+base rate would be £553/month for a 100K house in 2002 or £667/month on a 180K house now. That is actually less than the median gross annual salary increase in your graph.
Interest rates are hurting me more than anything else at the moment savings and other investments are making a fraction of what they used to.
Hence why people are putting their £ into property.